From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/cpu/hygon: Fix phys_proc_id calculation logic for multi-die processor
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:54:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322155449.GE12472@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553251380-7015-1-git-send-email-puwen@hygon.cn>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 06:43:00PM +0800, Pu Wen wrote:
> For Hygon family 18h multi-die processor platform, which support 1-Die/
> 2-Die/4-Die per socket, the system view is shown in the following system
> topology.
>
> System View (with 1-Die 2-Socket):
> |------------|
> ------ -----
> SOCKET0 | D0 | | D1 | SOCKET1
> ------ -----
>
> System View (with 2-Die 2-socket):
> --------------------
> | -------------|------
> | | | |
> ------------ ------------
> SOCKET0 | D1 -- D0 | | D3 -- D2 | SOCKET1
> ------------ ------------
>
> System View (with 4-Die 2-Socket) :
> --------------------
> | -------------|------
> | | | |
> ------------ ------------
> | D1 -- D0 | | D7 -- D6 |
> | | \/ | | | | \/ | |
> SOCKET0 | | /\ | | | | /\ | | SOCKET1
> | D2 -- D3 | | D4 -- D5 |
> ------------ ------------
> | | | |
> ------|------------| |
> --------------------
>
> Current codes direct use "phys_proc_id = initial_apicid >> bits", which
Use proper english please - there's no "codes"
> calc phys_proc_id from initial_apicid by shifting *bits*, will get
... or "calc"
> wrong phys_proc_id for Hygon family 18h 1-Die/2-Die 2-socket system.
>
> According to document [1] section 2.1.11.1, the *bits* is the value of
> CPUID_Fn80000008_ECX[12:15]. The value may be 4, 5 or 6. The definitions
> are: 4 - 1 die, 5 - 2 die, 6 - 3/4 die.
>
> ApicId definition is as below (see section 2.1.10.2.1.3 of [1]):
> -------------------------------------------------
> Bit | 6 | 5 4 | 3 | 2 1 0 |
> |-----------|---------|--------|----------------|
> IDs | Socket ID | Node ID | CCX ID | Core/Thread ID |
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> So for 3/4-Die CPU the *bits* is 6, which is same to ApicID definition
> field, which still can get correct socket ID for 2-socket system. But
> for 1-Die or 2-Die CPU the *bits* is 4 or 5, which will cause the right
> shifted result is not exactly the value of socket ID.
>
> For Hygon family 18h CPU the socket ID should be obtained from ApicId[6].
> To fix the problem and match ApicID field definition, adjust the shift
> bits to 6 for all Hygon family 18h multi-die CPUs.
Sounds to me like you're programming the initial APIC ID not
the same way as AMD do...
> Reference:
> [1] https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/54945_PPR_Family_17h_Models_00h-0Fh.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c
> index cf25405..2df6dd9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ static void hygon_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> if (!err)
> c->x86_coreid_bits = get_count_order(c->x86_max_cores);
>
> + /* Socket ID is ApicId[6] for these processors. */
> + c->phys_proc_id = c->apicid >> 6;
That 6 is a magic number, I assume?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-22 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 10:43 [RFC PATCH] x86/cpu/hygon: Fix phys_proc_id calculation logic for multi-die processor Pu Wen
2019-03-22 15:54 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-03-22 16:19 ` Pu Wen
2019-03-22 16:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-22 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-23 3:00 ` Pu Wen
2019-03-23 1:48 ` Pu Wen
2019-03-23 8:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-22 17:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-23 2:13 ` Pu Wen
2019-03-23 8:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-23 10:56 ` Pu Wen
2019-03-23 11:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-23 11:11 ` Pu Wen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190322155449.GE12472@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=puwen@hygon.cn \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox