From: "andriy.shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "zhuchangchun@cvte.com" <zhuchangchun@cvte.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"linus.walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hendychu <hendychu@aliyun.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: Implements gpio free function
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 18:48:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190323164810.GE9224@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2019032314505202825175@cvte.com>
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 02:51:52PM +0800, zhuchangchun@cvte.com wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:14:14AM +0800, zhuchangchun@cvte.com wrote:
> > From above,you can kown when you export a GPIO ,it will do request,
> >
> > and there will set TX and RX register at the time same time.
> >
> > when you try to set direction in and set value, TX register value can
> > roll back
> >
> > the value,but RX register was not set, so who will set RX value back??
>
> I think you are looking at some older code. There is now function
> __intel_gpio_set_direction() that is supposed to set both buffers
> depending on the direction. It was introduced with commit 17fab473693e
> ("pinctrl: intel: Set pin direction properly").
>
>
> --> Yes ,I see the latest master branch, the __intel_gpio_set_direction will
> set RX and TX, but I still think we need to implement free function,cause
> it will help many other engineers,especailly for some manufactories use some
> module,and this modules embeded its own driver but not can be modified,
> if they want use the gpio control the module, they may meet the same problem.
What problem?
Is it reproducible on latest vanilla kernel?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-23 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-21 2:35 [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: Implements gpio free function zhuchangchun
2019-03-21 8:44 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-03-21 9:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-22 18:32 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-03-22 19:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-25 9:36 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-03-25 11:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-03 4:13 ` Linus Walleij
2019-04-04 10:51 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-04-04 11:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-04 16:03 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <2019032119195575582546@cvte.com>
2019-03-21 12:03 ` Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <2019032120213955866649@cvte.com>
2019-03-21 12:36 ` Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <2019032121342663125658@cvte.com>
2019-03-21 13:56 ` Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <2019032211131426883268@cvte.com>
2019-03-22 10:42 ` Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <2019032314505202825175@cvte.com>
2019-03-23 16:48 ` andriy.shevchenko [this message]
[not found] ` <2019032517511048990383@cvte.com>
2019-03-25 11:48 ` andriy.shevchenko
2019-03-22 18:35 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190323164810.GE9224@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hendychu@aliyun.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhuchangchun@cvte.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox