From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
thibodux@gmail.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, jgross@suse.com, ryan.thibodeaux@starlab.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/xen: Add "xen_timer_slop" command line option
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:07:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190325150703.3774b92d@luca64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69e40698-f7ae-11c3-e4b7-dda4f1fadcf6@oracle.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:43:20 -0400
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
[...]
> > http://retis.santannapisa.it/luca/XenTimers/
> > (there also is a link to the scripts to be used for reproducing the
> > results). The latencies have been measured by running cyclictest in
> > the guest (see the scripts for details).
> >
> > The picture shows the latencies measured with an unpatched guest
> > kernel and with a guest kernel having TIMER_SLOP set to 1000
> > (arbitrary small value :).
> > All the experiments have been performed booting the hypervisor with
> > a small timer_slop (the hypervisor's one) value. So, they show that
> > decreasing the hypervisor's timer_slop is not enough to measure low
> > latencies with cyclictest.
>
>
>
> I have a couple of questions:
> * Does it make sense to make this a tunable for other clockevent
> devices as well?
> * This patch adjusts min value. Could max value (ever) need a similar
> adjustment?
Sorry, I do not know much about clockevent devices, so I have no answers
to these questions...
What I can say is that when I repeated the cyclictest experiments on
VMs using a different clockevent device (lapic) I did not measure large
latencies.
So, I guess the "lapic" clockevent device already defaults to a smaller
min value (not sure about other clockevent devices, I do not know how
to test them).
Luca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-25 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 18:29 [PATCH] x86/xen: Add "xen_timer_slop" command line option thibodux
2019-03-22 22:10 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-03-23 2:58 ` Dario Faggioli
2019-03-23 10:41 ` luca abeni
2019-03-25 12:05 ` luca abeni
2019-03-25 13:43 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-03-25 14:07 ` luca abeni [this message]
2019-03-25 14:11 ` Ryan Thibodeaux
2019-03-25 17:36 ` Ryan Thibodeaux
2019-03-25 18:31 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-03-26 9:13 ` Dario Faggioli
2019-03-26 11:12 ` luca abeni
2019-03-26 11:41 ` Ryan Thibodeaux
2019-03-26 23:21 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-03-27 10:00 ` Ryan Thibodeaux
2019-03-27 14:46 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-03-27 14:59 ` Ryan Thibodeaux
2019-03-27 15:19 ` Dario Faggioli
2019-03-23 12:00 ` Ryan Thibodeaux
2019-03-24 18:07 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-03-25 10:36 ` Dario Faggioli
2019-04-24 18:47 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190325150703.3774b92d@luca64 \
--to=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com \
--cc=ryan.thibodeaux@starlab.io \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thibodux@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox