From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A621C43381 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE7420823 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731718AbfCZN4C (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:56:02 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:34009 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726140AbfCZN4B (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:56:01 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2019 06:56:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,271,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="125986510" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.72.86]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2019 06:55:59 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1h8mYX-0003cO-W8; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:55:57 +0200 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:55:57 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Petr Mladek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Heikki Krogerus Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] lib/vsprintf: Add %pfw conversion specifier for printing fwnode names Message-ID: <20190326135557.GD9224@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20190322152930.16642-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20190322152930.16642-6-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20190322172114.GY9224@smile.fi.intel.com> <20190324181745.vgckevapfwi7mul7@mara.localdomain> <20190326131353.GY9224@smile.fi.intel.com> <20190326133947.pbniwkvszlahw3dr@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190326133947.pbniwkvszlahw3dr@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:39:47PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:13:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 08:17:46PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > The patch series by Petr I mentioned takes care about OF case. But it doesn't > > have covered yours by obvious reasons. > > Do you happen to have a pointer to it? Petr, can you share what is the state of affairs with that series? > The behaviour on others is different indeed, you're generally printing a > single item at a time. The question rather is, whether we want to be > compatible with %pOF going forward or not. I'd prefer that, so using the > fwnode API would be easier. I would prefer to mimic %pOF and actually to deprecate it in favour of %pfw. But it's just mine opinion. I'm skeptical about getting support on it. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko