From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/11] rcu: Inline RCU task stall-warning helper functions
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:22:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190326232225.21332-4-paulmck@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190326232208.GA20384@linux.ibm.com>
The rcu_print_detail_task_stall(), rcu_print_task_stall_begin(), and
rcu_print_task_stall_end() functions were defined to allow long-gone
Kconfig options to provide an abbreviated RCU CPU stall warning printout.
This commit saves a few lines of code by inlining them into their sole
callers.
While in the area, a useless call of rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp()
on the root rcu_node structure was eliminated. If there is only one
rcu_node structure, its tasks get printed twice, but if there are more,
the root rcu_node structure is guaranteed to have an empty list of blocked
tasks, hence the uselessness. (Long ago, root rcu_node structures with
non-empty ->blkd_tasks lists could happen, but no longer.)
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1 -
kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 36 +++++++-----------------------------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 3c4e26fff806..c6df9a13dd06 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ static void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void);
static void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(void);
/* Forward declarations for tree_stall.h */
-static void rcu_print_detail_task_stall(void);
static int rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp);
static void record_gp_stall_check_time(void);
static void check_cpu_stall(struct rcu_data *rdp);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
index e0e73f493363..b476786b8ef7 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
@@ -94,30 +94,6 @@ static void rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
}
-/*
- * Dump detailed information for all tasks blocking the current RCU
- * grace period.
- */
-static void rcu_print_detail_task_stall(void)
-{
- struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root();
-
- rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(rnp);
- rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp)
- rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(rnp);
-}
-
-static void rcu_print_task_stall_begin(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
- pr_err("\tTasks blocked on level-%d rcu_node (CPUs %d-%d):",
- rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi);
-}
-
-static void rcu_print_task_stall_end(void)
-{
- pr_cont("\n");
-}
-
/*
* Scan the current list of tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical
* sections, printing out the tid of each.
@@ -129,14 +105,15 @@ static int rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
if (!rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp))
return 0;
- rcu_print_task_stall_begin(rnp);
+ pr_err("\tTasks blocked on level-%d rcu_node (CPUs %d-%d):",
+ rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi);
t = list_entry(rnp->gp_tasks->prev,
struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry);
list_for_each_entry_continue(t, &rnp->blkd_tasks, rcu_node_entry) {
pr_cont(" P%d", t->pid);
ndetected++;
}
- rcu_print_task_stall_end();
+ pr_cont("\n");
return ndetected;
}
@@ -146,7 +123,7 @@ static int rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
* Because preemptible RCU does not exist, we never have to check for
* tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical sections.
*/
-static void rcu_print_detail_task_stall(void)
+static void rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
}
@@ -253,7 +230,7 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(unsigned long gp_seq)
unsigned long gpa;
unsigned long j;
int ndetected = 0;
- struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root();
+ struct rcu_node *rnp;
long totqlen = 0;
/* Kick and suppress, if so configured. */
@@ -291,7 +268,8 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(unsigned long gp_seq)
rcu_dump_cpu_stacks();
/* Complain about tasks blocking the grace period. */
- rcu_print_detail_task_stall();
+ rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp)
+ rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(rnp);
} else {
if (rcu_seq_current(&rcu_state.gp_seq) != gp_seq) {
pr_err("INFO: Stall ended before state dump start\n");
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-26 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-26 23:22 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/11] RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v5.2 Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/11] rcu: Move RCU CPU stall-warning code out of update.c Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/11] rcu: Move RCU CPU stall-warning code out of tree_plugin.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu: Move RCU CPU stall-warning code out of tree.c Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/11] rcu: Move rcu_print_task_exp_stall() to tree_exp.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/11] rcu: Inline RCU stall-warning info helper functions Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/11] rcu: Move FAST_NO_HZ stall-warning code to tree_stall.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/11] rcu: Organize functions in tree_stall.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/11] rcu: Move irq-disabled stall-warning checking to tree_stall.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/11] rcu: Move forward-progress checkers into tree_stall.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/11] rcu: Fix nohz status in stall warning Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190326232225.21332-4-paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox