public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/11] rcu: Move rcu_print_task_exp_stall() to tree_exp.h
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:22:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190326232225.21332-5-paulmck@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190326232208.GA20384@linux.ibm.com>

Because expedited CPU stall warnings are contained within the
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h file, rcu_print_task_exp_stall() should live
there too.  This commit carries out the required code motion.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h    | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 31 -------------------------------
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 4c2a0189e748..7be3e085ddd6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
 
 static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused);
+static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp);
 
 /*
  * Record the start of an expedited grace period.
@@ -670,6 +671,27 @@ static void sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup(int cpu)
 {
 }
 
+/*
+ * Scan the current list of tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical
+ * sections, printing out the tid of each that is blocking the current
+ * expedited grace period.
+ */
+static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	struct task_struct *t;
+	int ndetected = 0;
+
+	if (!rnp->exp_tasks)
+		return 0;
+	t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev,
+		       struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry);
+	list_for_each_entry_continue(t, &rnp->blkd_tasks, rcu_node_entry) {
+		pr_cont(" P%d", t->pid);
+		ndetected++;
+	}
+	return ndetected;
+}
+
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
 
 /* Invoked on each online non-idle CPU for expedited quiescent state. */
@@ -709,6 +731,16 @@ static void sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup(int cpu)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, we never have to check for
+ * tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical sections that are
+ * blocking the current expedited grace period.
+ */
+static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
 
 /**
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 7fa3bc4d481b..72519c57f656 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -642,27 +642,6 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
 	rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(t, flags);
 }
 
-/*
- * Scan the current list of tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical
- * sections, printing out the tid of each that is blocking the current
- * expedited grace period.
- */
-static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-	struct task_struct *t;
-	int ndetected = 0;
-
-	if (!rnp->exp_tasks)
-		return 0;
-	t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev,
-		       struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry);
-	list_for_each_entry_continue(t, &rnp->blkd_tasks, rcu_node_entry) {
-		pr_cont(" P%d", t->pid);
-		ndetected++;
-	}
-	return ndetected;
-}
-
 /*
  * Check that the list of blocked tasks for the newly completed grace
  * period is in fact empty.  It is a serious bug to complete a grace
@@ -906,16 +885,6 @@ static bool rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
 }
 static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t) { }
 
-/*
- * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, we never have to check for
- * tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical sections that are
- * blocking the current expedited grace period.
- */
-static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * Because there is no preemptible RCU, there can be no readers blocked,
  * so there is no need to check for blocked tasks.  So check only for
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-26 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-26 23:22 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/11] RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v5.2 Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/11] rcu: Move RCU CPU stall-warning code out of update.c Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/11] rcu: Move RCU CPU stall-warning code out of tree_plugin.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu: Move RCU CPU stall-warning code out of tree.c Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/11] rcu: Inline RCU task stall-warning helper functions Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/11] rcu: Inline RCU stall-warning info " Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/11] rcu: Move FAST_NO_HZ stall-warning code to tree_stall.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/11] rcu: Organize functions in tree_stall.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/11] rcu: Move irq-disabled stall-warning checking to tree_stall.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/11] rcu: Move forward-progress checkers into tree_stall.h Paul E. McKenney
2019-03-26 23:22 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/11] rcu: Fix nohz status in stall warning Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190326232225.21332-5-paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox