From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/syscalls: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 02:12:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327231215.GA815@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903272351110.1789@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1911 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:52:19PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:29:16PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:12:45PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > > > On 03/23, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > > 2) syscall_set_arguments() has been introduced in 2008 and we still have
> > > > > > no caller. Instead of polishing it, can it be removed completely or are
> > > > > > there plans to actually use it?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it can die.
> > > >
> > > > When PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO is finally squeezed into the kernel,
> > > > we could discuss adding PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO as well, and it
> > > > will need syscall_set_arguments().
> > >
> > > So if that ever happens, then adding the code back isn't rocket
> > > science. But if not, then there is no point in carrying the dead horse
> > > around another 11 years.
> >
> > Given that it took me roughly 4 months to get a relatively simple revert
> > of commit 5e937a9ae913 accepted into linux-next, adding the code back
> > might be time-consuming.
> >
> > Could we delay the removal of syscall_set_arguments() until
> > PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO is merged into the kernel?
> > I hope it won't take another 11 years.
>
> Hope dies last :)
>
> Seriously. If we keep it can we at least remove all the unused arguments
> which we have on both functions to simplify the whole mess?
In case of syscall_set_arguments() I think we can safely remove
"i" and "n" arguments assuming i == 0 and n == 6.
All I can say about syscall_get_arguments() is that
- all current users invoke it with i == 0,
- all current users that invoke it with n != 6 are in kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
so it may actually be invoked with n < 6.
--
ldv
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-27 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 19:27 [PATCH v2] x86/syscalls: Mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-03-23 16:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-26 15:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-26 16:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-26 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-26 16:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-27 1:26 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-03-27 14:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-27 22:20 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-03-27 22:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-27 23:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-27 23:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin [this message]
2019-03-27 23:15 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190327231215.GA815@altlinux.org \
--to=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox