Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] mm/hmm: add helpers for driver to safely take the mmap_sem v2

John Hubbard
2019-03-28T20:54:06Z

On 3/25/19 7:40 AM, jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
>
> The device driver context which holds reference to mirror and thus to
> core hmm struct might outlive the mm against which it was created. To
> avoid every driver to check for that case provide an helper that check
> if mm is still alive and take the mmap_sem in read mode if so. If the
> mm have been destroy (mmu_notifier release call back did happen) then
> we return -EINVAL so that calling code knows that it is trying to do
> something against a mm that is no longer valid.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - removed bunch of useless check (if API is use with bogus argument
> better to fail loudly so user fix their code)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/hmm.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
> index f3b919b04eda..5f9deaeb9d77 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hmm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
> @@ -438,6 +438,50 @@ struct hmm_mirror {
> int hmm_mirror_register(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, struct mm_struct *mm);
> void hmm_mirror_unregister(struct hmm_mirror *mirror);
>
> +/*
> + * hmm_mirror_mm_down_read() - lock the mmap_sem in read mode
> + * @mirror: the HMM mm mirror for which we want to lock the mmap_sem
> + * Returns: -EINVAL if the mm is dead, 0 otherwise (lock taken).
> + *
> + * The device driver context which holds reference to mirror and thus to core
> + * hmm struct might outlive the mm against which it was created. To avoid every
> + * driver to check for that case provide an helper that check if mm is still
> + * alive and take the mmap_sem in read mode if so. If the mm have been destroy
> + * (mmu_notifier release call back did happen) then we return -EINVAL so that
> + * calling code knows that it is trying to do something against a mm that is
> + * no longer valid.
> + */
> +static inline int hmm_mirror_mm_down_read(struct hmm_mirror *mirror)

Hi Jerome,

Let's please not do this. There are at least two problems here:

1. The hmm_mirror_mm_down_read() wrapper around down_read() requires a
return value. This is counter to how locking is normally done: callers do
not normally have to check the return value of most locks (other than
trylocks). And sure enough, your own code below doesn't check the return value.
That is a pretty good illustration of why not to do this.

2. This is a weird place to randomly check for semi-unrelated state, such
as "is HMM still alive". By that I mean, if you have to detect a problem
at down_read() time, then the problem could have existed both before and
after the call to this wrapper. So it is providing a false sense of security,
and it is therefore actually undesirable to add the code.

If you insist on having this wrapper, I think it should have approximately
this form:

void hmm_mirror_mm_down_read(...)
{
WARN_ON(...)
down_read(...)
}

> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> +
> + /* Sanity check ... */
> + if (!mirror || !mirror->hmm)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + /*
> + * Before trying to take the mmap_sem make sure the mm is still
> + * alive as device driver context might outlive the mm lifetime.

Let's find another way, and a better place, to solve this problem.
Ref counting?

> + *
> + * FIXME: should we also check for mm that outlive its owning
> + * task ?
> + */
> + mm = READ_ONCE(mirror->hmm->mm);
> + if (mirror->hmm->dead || !mm)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * hmm_mirror_mm_up_read() - unlock the mmap_sem from read mode
> + * @mirror: the HMM mm mirror for which we want to lock the mmap_sem
> + */
> +static inline void hmm_mirror_mm_up_read(struct hmm_mirror *mirror)
> +{
> + up_read(&mirror->hmm->mm->mmap_sem);
> +}
> +
>
> /*
> * To snapshot the CPU page table you first have to call hmm_range_register()
> @@ -463,7 +507,7 @@ void hmm_mirror_unregister(struct hmm_mirror *mirror);
> * if (ret)
> * return ret;
> *
> - * down_read(mm->mmap_sem);
> + * hmm_mirror_mm_down_read(mirror);

See? The normal down_read() code never needs to check a return value, so when
someone does a "simple" upgrade, it introduces a fatal bug here: if the wrapper
returns early, then the caller proceeds without having acquired the mmap_sem.

> * again:
> *
> * if (!hmm_range_wait_until_valid(&range, TIMEOUT)) {
> @@ -476,13 +520,13 @@ void hmm_mirror_unregister(struct hmm_mirror *mirror);
> *
> * ret = hmm_range_snapshot(&range); or hmm_range_fault(&range);
> * if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
> - * down_read(mm->mmap_sem);
> + * hmm_mirror_mm_down_read(mirror);

Same problem here.

thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA