From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83761C43381 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5806E206DD for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729528AbfC2Mcs (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:32:48 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:41423 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729484AbfC2Mcr (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:32:47 -0400 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 512) id E499C8073A; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:32:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:32:44 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Hans de Goede Cc: "Chen, Hu" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / PM: Propagate KEY_POWER to user space when resume Message-ID: <20190329123244.GA20104@amd> References: <20190328103448.20335-1-hu1.chen@intel.com> <20190329102519.GA11784@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <23bc59ef-fc25-440b-ab1c-c5db6b5cf6d2@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23bc59ef-fc25-440b-ab1c-c5db6b5cf6d2@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri 2019-03-29 12:38:39, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On 3/29/19 11:25 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >>I run Android on x86 PC (it's a NUC). Everytime I press the power button > >>to wake the system, it suspends right away. After some debug, I find > >>that Android wants to see KEY_POWER at resume. Otherwise, its > >>opportunistic suspend will kick in shortly. > >> > >>However, other OS such as Ubuntu doesn't like KEY_POWER at resume. So > >>add a knob "/sys/module/button/parameters/key_power_at_resume" for users > >>to select. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Chen, Hu > > > >NAK. > > > >Fix android, lets not break kernel. >=20 > It is not that simple, as I explained in my other reply to this > patch, we alreayd have inconsistent behavior here inside the kernel. >=20 > When KEY_POWER is handled by the gpio-keys driver it does explicitly > send a KET_POWER press event when the system is woken up through the > power-button. Which may be okay. > Arguably that is more consistent, e.g. some systems can also be woken > up through a home-button press and in that case we do want the KEY_HOMEPA= GE > to be propagated to userspace after the wakeup so that we not only wake > but also switch to the homescreen (whatever that might be). Which may also be okay. > Note I'm not saying that I'm happy with any of this, but simply NACK-ing > this patch is IMHO not the answer. Well, to add a knob "/sys/module/button/parameters/key_power_at_resume" is really not acceptable. Android does not know that it needs to set it, so it will not set it, and the problem remains. Plus, we get a great mess in future. But yes, we might want userland to know why the system woke up. And it would be good if everything also worked with wake-on-lan. Hmm. It is also possible that PC's ACPI power button should generate something else than KEY_POWER. Power button on my USB keyboard generates that, and that is really quite different button the one on the box. I'm not saying I know what the solution is. But we should have one solution, not a knob to select between different solutions. Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlyeEGwACgkQMOfwapXb+vIeZgCfUC8q4+n31T3i6R7APn52ZVnW ei0An22NKrpngC6KAJZhnySIy5Ngkkud =NPzD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--