public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: pierre kuo <vichy.kuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] initrd: move initrd_start calculate within linear mapping range check
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:38:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190401153810.GC6884@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOVJa8Eefs7cEneNwV0VCrr8GLVb0AweJEb0Qo4TucgXTNuNWg@mail.gmail.com>

[+Ard in case I'm missing something]

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:59:53PM +0800, pierre kuo wrote:
> > > With CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE we can get a further change to memstart_addr
> > > after the place where you moved the initrd_{start,end} setting, which
> > > would result in a different value for __phys_to_virt(phys_initrd_start).
> >
> > I found what you mean, since __phys_to_virt will use PHYS_OFFSET
> > (memstart_addr) for calculating.
> > How about moving CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE part of code ahead of
> > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD checking?
> >
> > That means below (d) moving ahead of (c)
> > prvious:
> > if (memstart_addr + linear_region_size < memblock_end_of_DRAM()) {} ---(a)
> > if (memory_limit != PHYS_ADDR_MAX) {}            ---(b)
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) && phys_initrd_size) {} ---(c)
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)) {} ---(d)
> >
> > now:
> > if (memstart_addr + linear_region_size < memblock_end_of_DRAM()) { ---(a)
> > if (memory_limit != PHYS_ADDR_MAX) {}              ----------------(b)
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)) {}  --------------(d)
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) && phys_initrd_size) {}  ---(c)
> >
> 
> After tracing the kernel code,
> is it even possible to move CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE part of code ahead
> of memory_limit?
> 
> that mean the flow may look like below:
> now2:
> if (memstart_addr + linear_region_size < memblock_end_of_DRAM()) {} ---(a)
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)) {} ---(d)
> if (memory_limit != PHYS_ADDR_MAX) {}            ---(b)
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) && phys_initrd_size) {} ---(c)
> 
> in (b), the result of __pa_symbol(_text), memory_limit,
> memblock_mem_limit_remove_map and  memblock_add
> are not depended on memsart_addr.
> So the now2 flow can grouping modification of memstart_address, put
> (a) and (d) together.

I'm afraid that you've lost me with this. Why isn't it just as simple as
the diff below?

Will

--->8

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index c29b17b520cd..ec3487c94b10 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
 			 base + size > memblock_start_of_DRAM() +
 				       linear_region_size,
 			"initrd not fully accessible via the linear mapping -- please check your bootloader ...\n")) {
-			initrd_start = 0;
+			phys_initrd_size = 0;
 		} else {
 			memblock_remove(base, size); /* clear MEMBLOCK_ flags */
 			memblock_add(base, size);

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-01 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-14  3:20 [PATCH v2 1/1] initrd: move initrd_start calculate within linear mapping range check pierre Kuo
2019-03-18  3:06 ` pierre kuo
2019-03-19 15:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-03-31 15:14   ` pierre kuo
2019-04-01 14:59     ` pierre kuo
2019-04-01 15:38       ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-04-03 16:44         ` pierre kuo
2019-04-03 17:24           ` Will Deacon
2019-04-03 17:27             ` Florian Fainelli
2019-04-08 16:26             ` pierre kuo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190401153810.GC6884@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=vichy.kuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox