From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@01.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] slob: Only use list functions when safe to do so
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:12:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190402121239.76d64e3c262dcb24ebcee058@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190402190538.GA5084@eros.localdomain>
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 06:05:38 +1100 "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc> wrote:
> > It's regrettable that this fixes
> > slob-respect-list_head-abstraction-layer.patch but doesn't apply to
> > that patch - slob-use-slab_list-instead-of-lru.patch gets in the way.
> > So we end up with a patch series which introduces a bug and later
> > fixes it.
>
> Yes I thought that also. Do you rebase the mm tree? Did you apply this
> right after slob-use-slab_list-instead-of-lru or to the current tip?
After slob-use-slab_list-instead-of-lru.patch
> If
> it is applied to the tip does this effect the ability to later bisect in
> between these two commits (if the need arises for some unrelated reason)?
There is a bisection hole but it is short and the bug is hardish to
hit.
> > I guess we can live with that but if the need comes to respin this
> > series, please do simply fix
> > slob-respect-list_head-abstraction-layer.patch so we get a clean
> > series.
>
> If its not too much work for you to apply the new series I'll do another
> version just to get this right.
I guess that would be best, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-02 3:29 [PATCH 0/1] slob: Fix list_head bug during allocation Tobin C. Harding
2019-04-02 3:29 ` [PATCH 1/1] slob: Only use list functions when safe to do so Tobin C. Harding
2019-04-02 4:41 ` Andrew Morton
2019-04-02 19:05 ` Tobin C. Harding
2019-04-02 19:12 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190402121239.76d64e3c262dcb24ebcee058@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tobin@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox