Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use efi_setup_data for searching RSDP on kexec-ed kernel

Chao Fan
2019-04-04T07:48:25Z

On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:41:02PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>Hi Chao,
>On 04/04/19 at 03:20pm, Chao Fan wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 02:41:30PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>> >On 04/04/19 at 11:22am, Dave Young wrote:
>> >> On 04/04/19 at 11:10am, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >> > On 04/04/19 at 11:00am, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >> > > On 04/04/19 at 10:52am, Dave Young wrote:
>> >> > > > On 04/04/19 at 01:23am, Junichi Nomura wrote:
>> >> > + /* Save RSDP address for later use. */
>> >> > + boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr = get_rsdp_addr();
>> >> > +
>> >> > + error("Hang kernel for kexec debugging");
>> >> >
>> >> > Sorry, here I means calling error() to hang kernel after calling
>> >> > get_rsdp_addr().
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, it did not hang, it always reset to firmware/grub boot menu.
>> >> I'm pretty sure now the bug exists in get_rsdp_addr().
>> >
>> >static acpi_physical_address kexec_get_rsdp_addr(void)
>> >{
>> >...
>> > /* Get systab from boot params. */
>> > systab = (efi_system_table_64_t *) (ei->efi_systab | ((__u64)ei->efi_systab_hi << 32));
>> > if (!systab)
>> > error("EFI system table not found in kexec boot_params.");
>> >
>> >...
>> > -> add error("hang me") here will have a hang
>> >...
>> > return __efi_get_rsdp_addr((unsigned long)esd->tables,
>> > systab->nr_tables, true);
>> >
>>
>> I have an idea, but not sure whether is a problem.
>> In code of Nomura:
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_EFI) && defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
>> [...]
>> if (strncmp(sig, EFI64_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4)) {
>> debug_putstr("Wrong kexec EFI loader signature.\n");
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> /* Get systab from boot params. */
>> systab = (efi_system_table_64_t *) (ei->efi_systab | ((__u64)ei->efi_systab_hi << 32));
>> [...]
>> #endif
>>
>> After review agian, I wonder what will happen if 32bit-efi boot 64bit
>> OS.
>
>It is hard to find 32bit efi hardware, I can confirm all the laptop I
>have are 64bit efi.
>
>In case 32bit efi EFI64_LOADER_SIGNATURE checking will be false.

Yes, just when reviewing code, I notice this problem.

Thanks,
Chao Fan
>
>