From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC165C4360F for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF1620830 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="g2WmTkDm" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728683AbfDCH5Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2019 03:57:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:41953 "EHLO mail-pf1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726084AbfDCH5Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2019 03:57:16 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id 188so7739799pfd.8 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:57:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=IwPDCcHtBbtFNI5oM6cINn5nEmj9C1ceQx82ZK3MxZY=; b=g2WmTkDmAf9QsHTruBaKnuZC0rwX6AcGeQMW2dzyN/CTckgewW14oqAUOaYUobrRDr EUoTcAE2W8v1Ds9pAFMBKXXBbDi/WCc/p0y0eLERCecqYGrbs7Sw78hlk283klMq2hkP f32+pHCF6KPApk49Qv48YEFMVQ45hQwPI+xQV7XJHmTrAJWFnfEJAfp6rBawWqpKWNQF d9YaCvUqjA/SJmHtGLqXW6NfGjDSygXTp3n7mqrd9Ak1+KpBJhOEBN3HVl9l9cP+eWtV ZC+S8KQU+yikAOxHWdaui/qhuH9WjYQvtp4qMG9WX7BDIuVLQY0VeEsYOdWF2ktAZrCu VYcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IwPDCcHtBbtFNI5oM6cINn5nEmj9C1ceQx82ZK3MxZY=; b=GNi9tefdavrwYV/xK0PHHqGmdLpheBpim+dYGzbJ21REpjQcTKvML9jFHUdi+W+4wa G4DaHq/4CYX/Ow3GC9zcBH7bQwLzjkGK4sTAkJwbIB1Xt3xeSjqe6aj5abOyoAJOnKAH ZyyfpUUGgQm/+UcvPL+JD1gsVOGQJ5+mKd6+4+ekP4hPOHMWfbpOffGn6UQ8hcHJdUTI PU3peBkyP/lpEpNKR71cFgmk13qebJ2gB4FudV90n8Ho+K+816gM7BdWlcoX8eR9KUpe ifpPMaOXlZNKPrFqWEBaTXeSaaaKi2Hv6ikVkybkaKvjCSfM8COaXDmYpbWiGVEJNdYu FohA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVR5c7xZCksVr8MZI6MlDIOS3QGmGl5hVQv2tc0V+l1evrRaw/9 +jNc3eau2UnqxkTGwxEf/fFJDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzm6P8ZtgWBW9J+YKNvWWlq5V3VPQqJo3RzyVbL27b/rDrISPZHTA29J5l7xck9q50qJC4+8A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4718:: with SMTP id u24mr72256115pga.381.1554278235390; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([147.50.13.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k65sm13741934pfb.68.2019.04.03.00.57.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 08:57:09 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Jacek Anaszewski Cc: Dan Murphy , robh+dt@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, tony@atomide.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove LM3532 backlight driver references Message-ID: <20190403075709.GD11301@dell> References: <20190321142838.22985-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20190321142838.22985-3-dmurphy@ti.com> <8769a95d-179f-6219-0a63-9dd623cdd297@gmail.com> <20190325075317.GW4731@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > On 3/25/19 8:53 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Mar 2019, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > > > > > Hi Lee, > > > > > > Can we have your ack for this going via LED tree, please? > > > > Patch looks okay. > > > > You can take it through the LED, but if you do I will need you to send > > me a pull-request to a minimised immutable branch please. > > > > If you cannot do this, I can apply the set and provide the same to > > you. > > > > If you choose the former: > > > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones > > > > Please let me know what you decide > > > > I've been exposing integration branches in the past, but after Linus' > message [0] I have my doubts now. I wonder if it wouldn't make more > sense if I just took the patches, and you'd cherry-pick them only in > case such a need occurs. This way we would avoid this whole merge > noise, which in an optimistic and very plausible case will not be needed > at all. > > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/19/1104 That email is 2 years old, and does not seem relevant to what we're trying to achieve. I've only ever had issues when *not* creating immutable branches for these, cross subsystem scenarios. The shared branches I create are always minimalist and never change. I'm happy to take the patches and create a suitable pull-request for you if you are uncomfortable with the process. I just need your Ack to do so. Up to you. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog