From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
To: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
Cc: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
Richard Gong <richard.gong@linux.intel.com>,
linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] fpga: mgr: add FPGA configuration log
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:08:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190403200800.GE5752@archbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANk1AXSJ31Q7X3J6NOsqVkQoJkjJz=xka0XiWvuYC36s1HiBuA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 01:37:51PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> >
> > it's state, not status for most fpga manager drivers. It should
> > return 'operating' if everything went well.
Yeah, sorry :)
> > It seems like there's a possible scenario where the FPGA starts up
> > with the FPGA in 'operating' mode and the user messes up early enough
> > that the state doesn't change.
Huh, then we should fix that instead? :)
> >
> > >
> > > Personally not in favor of extra messages, but if we do it we should
> > > change the message to "Sucessfully programmed FPGA".
> > >
> > > I think making it a dbg message is a good trade-off ...
>
> dbg vs info... On the one hand, it is a usually a message the
> developer wants to see so the developer would turn on debug messages.
> But then again FPGA programming doesn't happen that often and it is a
> kind of significant event since it is your hardware changing i.e. it
> won't add a lot messages, but it is sort of an important one if it
> happens. If the system crashes after a FPGA reprogramming event, it
> would be good to have this in the log by default. I don't want to
> argue too powerfully for adding extra messages though. Is this a case
> where info is worth it since fpga programming is significant?
In the current setup, it doesn't happen often. Going forward people
might have use-cases where this happens a lot more often.
I mean if y'all feel like this is required, sure, I still feel people
shouldn't rely on dmesg output for functional verification :)
I don't wanna guarantee that this message is gonna be there always ...
Cheers,
Moritz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-03 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-02 22:25 [PATCHv1] fpga: mgr: add FPGA configuration log richard.gong
2019-04-03 14:20 ` Moritz Fischer
2019-04-03 16:29 ` Alan Tull
2019-04-03 16:43 ` Richard Gong
2019-04-03 16:47 ` Moritz Fischer
2019-04-03 18:05 ` Alan Tull
2019-04-03 18:37 ` Alan Tull
2019-04-03 20:08 ` Moritz Fischer [this message]
2019-04-03 21:57 ` Alan Tull
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190403200800.GE5752@archbook \
--to=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=atull@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.gong@intel.com \
--cc=richard.gong@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox