linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add restrictions for kexec/kdump jumping between 5-level and 4-level kernel
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:20:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190404022003.GS7627@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190312103051.18086-1-bhe@redhat.com>

PING

Any comment for this patch, Or consider to merge?

On 03/12/19 at 06:30pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> This is v3 post.
> 
> The original v1 post can be found here:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180829141624.13985-1-bhe@redhat.com
> 
> Later a v1 RESEND version:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190125022817.29506-1-bhe@redhat.com
> 
> V2 post is here:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190312005004.19182-1-bhe@redhat.com
> 
> This patchset is trying to fix several issues for kexec/kdump when
> dynamic switching of paging mode is enabled in x86_64. The current
> kernel supports 5-level paging mode, and supports dynamically choosing
> paging mode during bootup according to kernel image, hardware and
> kernel parameter setting. This flexibility brings several issues for
> kexec/kdump:
> 
> Issues:
> 1)
> Dynamic switching between paging mode requires code change in target
> kernel. So we can't kexec jump from 5-level kernel to old 4-level
> kernel which lacks the code change.
> 
> 2)
> Switching from 5-level paging to 4-level paging kernel would fail, if
> kexec() put kernel image above 64TiB of memory.
> 
> 3)
> Kdump jumping has similar issue as 2). This require us to only
> reserve crashkernel below 64TB, otherwise jumping from 5-level to
> 4-level kernel will fail.
> 
> Note:
> Since we have two interfaces kexec_load() and kexec_file_load() to load
> kexec/kdump kernel, handling for them is a little different. For
> kexec_load(), most of the loading job is done in user space utility
> kexec_tools. However, for kexec_file_load(), most of the loading codes
> have moved into kernel because of kernel image verification.
> 
> Fixes:
> a) For issue 1), we need check if XLF_5LEVEL is set, otherwise error out
>    a message. 
>   -This need be done in both kernel and kexec_tools utility.
>   -Patch 2/3 is the handling of kernel part.
>   -Will post user space patch to kexec mailing list later.
> 
> b) For issue 2), we need check if both XLF_5LEVEL and XLF_5LEVEL_ENABLED
>    are set, otherwise error out a message.
>   -This only need be done in kexec_tools utility. Because for
>    kexec_file_load(), the current code searches area to put kernel from
>    bottom to up in system RAM, we usually can always find an area below
>    4 GB, no need to worry about 5-level kernel jumping to 4-level
>    kernel. While for kexec_load(), it's top down seraching area for kernel
>    loading, and implemented in user space. We need make sure that
>    5-level kernel find an area under 64 TB for a kexec-ed kernel of
>    4-level.
>   -Will post user space patch to kexec mailing list later.
> 
> c) For issues 3), just limit kernel to reserve crashkernel below 64 TB.
>   -This only need be done in kernel.
>   -It doesn't need to check bit XLF_5LEVEL or XLF_5LEVEL_ENABLED, we
>    just simply limit it below 64 TB which should be enough. Because
>    crashernel is reserved during the 1st kernel's bootup, we don't know
>    what kernel will be loaded for kdump usage.
>   -Patch 3/3 handles this.
> 
> Concerns from reviewing comments:
> 1)
> In v1, hpa raised concern that why the paging mode checking is not done
> before kexec jumping, the discussion can be found here:
> 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1809051002020.1416@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
> 
> As tglx said, it might be not doable for kdump since kdump kernel's
> reserved crashkernel region only owns a portion of memory, may
> be above 4G; and might be not safer to do paging mode checking and
> switching thing after crash.
> 
> 2)
> In v1 RESEND post, tglx asked why only bit XLF_5LEVEL is checked, even
> though two bits XLF_5LEVEL or XLF_5LEVEL_ENABLED added. So add more
> words to explain it in *Fixes* b).
> 
> Changelog:
> v2->v3:
>   Change the constant to match the notation for the rest of defines as
>   Kirill suggested;
> v1->v2:
>   Correct the subject of patch 1 according to tglx's comment;
>   Add more information to cover-letter to address reviewers' concerns;
> 
> Baoquan He (3):
>   x86/boot: Add xloadflags bits for 5-level kernel checking
>   x86/kexec/64: Error out if try to jump to old 4-level kernel from
>     5-level kernel
>   x86/kdump/64: Change the upper limit of crashkernel reservation
> 
>  arch/x86/boot/header.S                | 12 +++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c     |  5 +++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c               | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.2
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-04  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-12 10:30 [PATCH v3 0/3] Add restrictions for kexec/kdump jumping between 5-level and 4-level kernel Baoquan He
2019-03-12 10:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/boot: Add xloadflags bits for 5-level kernel checking Baoquan He
2019-04-05 20:23   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-06  1:40     ` Baoquan He
2019-03-12 10:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/kexec/64: Error out if try to jump to old 4-level kernel from 5-level kernel Baoquan He
2019-04-05 20:38   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-06  1:39     ` Baoquan He
2019-03-12 10:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] x86/kdump/64: Change the upper limit of crashkernel reservation Baoquan He
2019-04-04  2:20 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2019-04-06  1:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Add restrictions for kexec/kdump jumping between 5-level and 4-level kernel Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190404022003.GS7627@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).