public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mm: Do not use set_{pud,pmd}_safe when splitting the large page
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 10:40:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190409084031.GO4038@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408191103.13501-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 07:11:21PM +0000, Singh, Brijesh wrote:
> The following commit 0a9fe8ca844d ("x86/mm: Validate kernel_physical_mapping_init()
> PTE population") triggers the below warning in the SEV guest.
> 
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h:87 phys_pmd_init+0x30d/0x386
> Call Trace:
>  kernel_physical_mapping_init+0xce/0x259
>  early_set_memory_enc_dec+0x10f/0x160
>  kvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu+0x71/0x9d
>  start_kernel+0x1c9/0x50b
>  secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
> 
> The SEV guest calls kernel_physical_mapping_init() to clear the encryption
> mask from an existing mapping. While clearing the encryption mask
> kernel_physical_mapping_init() splits the large pages into the smaller.
> To split the page, the kernel_physical_mapping_init() allocates a new page
> and updates the existing entry. The set_{pud,pmd}_safe triggers warning
> when updating the entry with page in the present state. We should use the
> set_{pud,pmd} when updating an existing entry with the new entry.
> 
> Updating an entry will also requires a TLB flush. Currently the caller
> (early_set_memory_enc_dec()) is taking care of issuing the TLB flushes.

I'm not entirely sure I like this, this means all users of
kernel_physical_mapping_init() now need to be aware and careful.

That said; the alternative is adding an argument to the function and
propagating it through the callchain and dynamically switching between
_safe and not. Which doesn't sound ideal either.

Anybody else got clever ideas?

> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> Fixes: 0a9fe8ca844d (x86/mm: Validate kernel_physical_mapping_init() ...)
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index bccff68e3267..0a26b64a99b9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ phys_pmd_init(pmd_t *pmd_page, unsigned long paddr, unsigned long paddr_end,
>  		paddr_last = phys_pte_init(pte, paddr, paddr_end, new_prot);
>  
>  		spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> -		pmd_populate_kernel_safe(&init_mm, pmd, pte);
> +		pmd_populate_kernel(&init_mm, pmd, pte);
>  		spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>  	}
>  	update_page_count(PG_LEVEL_2M, pages);
> @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ phys_pud_init(pud_t *pud_page, unsigned long paddr, unsigned long paddr_end,
>  					   page_size_mask, prot);
>  
>  		spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
> -		pud_populate_safe(&init_mm, pud, pmd);
> +		pud_populate(&init_mm, pud, pmd);
>  		spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-09  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-08 19:11 [PATCH] x86: mm: Do not use set_{pud,pmd}_safe when splitting the large page Singh, Brijesh
2019-04-09  8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-04-09  9:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-09 10:20     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-09 19:09     ` Singh, Brijesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190409084031.GO4038@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox