From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, jolsa@kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 08/12] perf/x86/intel: Add Icelake support
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:47:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410194720.GC11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <688804aa-b6eb-0f19-828c-99b901bbe554@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:22:21PM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > > That is, are there really bits we want to mask in there?
> >
> > For instruction event, right, we don't need mask it.
> > I will change it.
> >
>
> Actually, we have to mask some bits here, e.g. ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INT,
> ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_USR and ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS. Those bits will be
> set in hw_config().
Ah, bah, You're right. I misread and though we were comparing against
the user provided raw config.
>
> Also, other filds, e.g the INV, ANY, E, or CMASK fields are not allowed for
> reduced Skid PEBS.
Sure, those are actually forced 0 with the existing thing.
I'll go fold smething like back in. Thanks!
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index dae3d84..3fa36c9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3463,6 +3463,9 @@ hsw_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
> int idx,
> return c;
> }
>
> +#define EVENT_CONFIG(config) \
> + (config & (X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS | INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK))
> +
> static struct event_constraint *
> icl_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
> struct perf_event *event)
> @@ -3472,7 +3475,7 @@ icl_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
> int idx,
> * Force instruction:ppp in Fixed counter 0
> */
> if ((event->attr.precise_ip == 3) &&
> - (event->hw.config == X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0)))
> + (EVENT_CONFIG(event->hw.config) == X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0)))
> return &fixed_counter0_constraint;
>
> return hsw_get_event_constraints(cpuc, idx, event);
>
> Thanks,
> Kan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-10 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-02 19:44 [PATCH V5 00/12] perf: Add Icelake support (kernel only, except Topdown) kan.liang
2019-04-02 19:44 ` [PATCH V5 01/12] perf/x86: Fix wrong PEBS_REGS kan.liang
2019-04-16 11:32 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Fix incorrect PEBS_REGS tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-04-02 19:44 ` [PATCH V5 02/12] perf/x86: Support outputting XMM registers kan.liang
2019-04-16 11:34 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-04-02 19:45 ` [PATCH V5 03/12] perf/x86/intel: Extract memory code PEBS parser for reuse kan.liang
2019-04-16 11:35 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2019-04-02 19:45 ` [PATCH V5 04/12] perf/x86/intel/ds: Extract code of event update in short period kan.liang
2019-04-16 11:35 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-04-02 19:45 ` [PATCH V5 05/12] perf/x86/intel: Support adaptive PEBSv4 kan.liang
2019-04-08 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-16 11:36 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Support adaptive PEBS v4 tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-04-02 19:45 ` [PATCH V5 06/12] perf/x86/lbr: Avoid reading the LBRs when adaptive PEBS handles them kan.liang
2019-04-16 11:37 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2019-04-02 19:45 ` [PATCH V5 07/12] perf/x86: Support constraint ranges kan.liang
2019-04-16 11:37 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-02 19:45 ` [PATCH V5 08/12] perf/x86/intel: Add Icelake support kan.liang
2019-04-08 15:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-08 15:45 ` Liang, Kan
2019-04-10 18:22 ` Liang, Kan
2019-04-10 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-04-11 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-11 13:29 ` Liang, Kan
2019-04-16 11:38 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-04-02 19:45 ` [PATCH V5 09/12] perf/x86/intel/cstate: " kan.liang
2019-04-16 11:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-04-02 19:45 ` [PATCH V5 10/12] perf/x86/intel/rapl: " kan.liang
2019-04-16 11:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-04-02 19:45 ` [PATCH V5 11/12] perf/x86/msr: " kan.liang
2019-04-16 11:40 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-04-02 19:45 ` [PATCH V5 12/12] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Intel Icelake uncore support kan.liang
2019-04-16 11:40 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-04-08 15:41 ` [PATCH V5 00/12] perf: Add Icelake support (kernel only, except Topdown) Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-08 16:06 ` Liang, Kan
2019-04-08 16:25 ` Liang, Kan
2019-04-08 16:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-08 22:49 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190410194720.GC11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox