Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Remove omap_dm_timer_set_load_start

[Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:56:57PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> * Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> [190411 19:21]:
> > On 10/04/2019 22:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > * Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> [190410 17:02]:
> > >> can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
> > > 
> > > I certainly do ask and wait for acks where possible :)
> > 
> > Ok, I may have missed them.
> > 
> > > Note that I have not applied this patch. I just added
> > > Keerthy to Cc on this thread so maybe you misread the
> > > message earlier. My comment "seems like no other
> > > takers" was for Ladislav regarding somebody picking up
> > > his earlier work, not for picking up this patch :)
> > 
> > Actually I was referring to the commit 592ea6bd1fad. Anyway as stated
> > above I could have miss your call.
> 
> Hmm so commit 592ea6bd1fad was part of the PWM timer series
> that was posted several times from late 2017 to end of
> February 2018. I did not get any timer related acks or
> comments so I applied it together with the PWM timer
> changes.
> 
> I'm guessing you may have accidentally checked out some
> older deja-vu branch from about a year ago? Commit
> 592ea6bd1fad is not related to this fix.. :)
> 

Just for the record, I said this patch fixes 592ea6bd1fad because
592ea6bd1fad should have been marked this function as static, which
would have exposed that this function was unused and it could have
been removed at that time. I know it is a bit of a stretch for this
commit (would be more appropriate for 008258d995a6 to have it) but
that was my logic behind it. Not opposed to having it removed before
committing.

Thanks,
Nathan

> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 
> 
>