Re: [PATCH libdrm] headers: Sync with drm-next

[Ayan Halder <Ayan.Halder@arm.com>]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 07:20:32AM +0100, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2019-04-10 21:49:33 -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:27 AM Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/msm_drm.h b/include/drm/msm_drm.h
> > > > > index c06d0a5..91a16b3 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/drm/msm_drm.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/drm/msm_drm.h
> > > > > @@ -105,14 +105,24 @@ struct drm_msm_gem_new {
> > > > >     __u32 handle;         /* out */
> > > > >  };
> > > > >
> > > > > -#define MSM_INFO_IOVA      0x01
> > > > > -
> > > > > -#define MSM_INFO_FLAGS (MSM_INFO_IOVA)
> > > > > +/* Get or set GEM buffer info.  The requested value can be passed
> > > > > + * directly in 'value', or for data larger than 64b 'value' is a
> > > > > + * pointer to userspace buffer, with 'len' specifying the number of
> > > > > + * bytes copied into that buffer.  For info returned by pointer,
> > > > > + * calling the GEM_INFO ioctl with null 'value' will return the
> > > > > + * required buffer size in 'len'
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +#define MSM_INFO_GET_OFFSET        0x00   /* get mmap() offset, returned by value */
> > > > > +#define MSM_INFO_GET_IOVA  0x01   /* get iova, returned by value */
> > > > > +#define MSM_INFO_SET_NAME  0x02   /* set the debug name (by pointer) */
> > > > > +#define MSM_INFO_GET_NAME  0x03   /* get debug name, returned by pointer */
> > > > >
> > > > >  struct drm_msm_gem_info {
> > > > >     __u32 handle;         /* in */
> > > > > -   __u32 flags;          /* in - combination of MSM_INFO_* flags */
> > > > > -   __u64 offset;         /* out, mmap() offset or iova */
> > > > > +   __u32 info;           /* in - one of MSM_INFO_* */
> > > > > +   __u64 value;          /* in or out */
> > > > > +   __u32 len;            /* in or out */
> > > > > +   __u32 pad;
> > >
> > > freedreno/msm/msm_bo.c needs to be updated to reflect those changes.
> > 
> > 
> > I think you can just rename flags->info and offset->value, the rest of
> > the struct should be zero-initialized.. if in doubt you can check
> > $mesa/src/freedreno/drm/msm_bo.c
> > 
> > side-note:  the libdrm_freedreno code was folded into mesa in 19.0, so
> > at *some* point we can probably disable libdrm_freedreno build by
> > default.
> 
> Right now, freedreno's `auto` enables it by default on arm and disables it on
> everything else.
> 
> I always enable everything to at least build-test it, but Ayan was using
> the defaults which is why he didn't see this issue at first.
> 
> Btw, the GitLab CI builds everything, so it hopefully won't bitrot unnoticed.

My bad, I was not aware that there is repo of libdrm in gitlab when I
submitted my v1 patch. I have taken care of it in my v2 patch ([PATCH
libdrm v2] headers: Sync with drm-next) and have also raised a merge
request
(https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/ayan.halder/drm/merge_requests/1/diffs)
to execute the gitlab ci tools.
Please be requested to have a look at my v2 patch.
> 
> > (I'd kinda still like to keep the code around for some misc
> > standalone tools I have, but that is the sort of thing where I can fix
> > libdrm if it gets broken).  When to switch to disabled by default I
> > guess comes down to how long we want to support mesa 18.x with latest
> > libdrm??  Maybe after 19.1, since (selfishly motivated) that gives me
> > a long enough window back in case I find myself needing to bisect for
> > some regression..