From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>,
weidu.du@huawei.com, Fang Wei <fangwei1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: erofs: fix unexpected out-of-bound data access
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:10:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190412151003.GA6990@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190412150633.GA20776@infradead.org>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 08:06:33AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/data.c
> > @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static inline struct bio *erofs_read_raw_page(struct bio *bio,
> > *last_block = current_block;
> >
> > /* shift in advance in case of it followed by too many gaps */
> > - if (unlikely(bio->bi_vcnt >= bio->bi_max_vecs)) {
> > + if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size >= bio->bi_max_vecs * PAGE_SIZE) {
>
> This is still a very odd check. bi_max_vecs * PAGE_SIZE is rather
> arbitrary… and more importantly bi_max_vecs is not really a public
> field, in fact this is the only place every using it outside the
> core block layer.
>
> I think the logic in this function should be reworked to what we
> do elsewhere in the kernel, that is just add to the bio until
> bio_add_page fails, in which case you submit the bio and start
> a new one. Then once you are done with your operation just submit
> the bio. Which unless I'm missing something is what the code does,
> except for the goto loop obsfucation that is trying to hide it.
>
> So why not something like:
And looking at this a little more - I think you should drop the
erofs raw ops entirely. The iomap-based readpage and readpages
from fs/iomap.c should serve your needs just fine without all that
duplication. The only thing missing is the cleancache calls,
which could easily be added.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-12 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-11 10:55 [PATCH] staging: erofs: fix unexpected out-of-bound data access Gao Xiang
2019-04-12 9:28 ` Chao Yu
2019-04-12 9:38 ` Gao Xiang
2019-04-12 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-12 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-04-12 15:35 ` Gao Xiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190412151003.GA6990@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=fangwei1@huawei.com \
--cc=gaoxiang25@huawei.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=weidu.du@huawei.com \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox