Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/uapi: add documentation for atomic flags

[Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>]

Hello Helen,

On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:58:24 -0300
Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com> wrote:

> add a brief description of the flags used in an atomic commit
> 
> Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
> Changes in v1: None
> 
>  include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h
> index 83cd1636b9be..88ef2cf04d13 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h
> @@ -729,7 +729,23 @@ struct drm_mode_destroy_dumb {
>  	__u32 handle;
>  };
>  
> -/* page-flip flags are valid, plus: */
> +/*

You might want to use a standard kernel/sphynx doc header so that it
can be parsed by sphynx and included in the DRM doc.

> + * drm atomic flags
> + *
> + * page-flip flags are valid, plus:
> + *
> + * DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY
> + * Used with fences to check if the Sync File is a valid one.

I think it can be used for any kind of tests, like when you want to
know if a combination of property updates is supported. It's fine
having the fence example, but I think you should be clear that it's
just one use case.

> + *
> + * DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_NONBLOCK
> + * Perform a normal atomic update but do not block the ioctl until the request
> + * is finished, return the ioctl call immediately.
> + *
> + * DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET
> + * Indicates whether a full modeset is acceptable or not.
> + */
> +
> +/*  */
>  #define DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY 0x0100
>  #define DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_NONBLOCK  0x0200
>  #define DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET 0x0400

Regards,

Boris