From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ras: fix an off-by-one error in __find_elem()
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:53:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190417015351.GA28490@agluck-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpXBJ2eAz4TW_GmOWRLrkyJcO=u-8VSnmv91ZABG-21Agg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 04:47:55PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> 229 static void del_elem(struct ce_array *ca, int idx)
> 230 {
> 231 /* Save us a function call when deleting the last element. */
> 232 if (ca->n - (idx + 1))
> 233 memmove((void *)&ca->array[idx],
> 234 (void *)&ca->array[idx + 1],
> 235 (ca->n - (idx + 1)) * sizeof(u64));
> 236
> 237 ca->n--;
> 238 }
>
> idx is ca->n and ca->n is MAX_ELEMS-1, then the above if statement
> becomes true, therefore idx+1 is MAX_ELEMS which is just beyond
> the valid range.
Is that really the memmove() where we die? It looks like
it has a special case for dealing with the last element.
But this:
296 ret = find_elem(ca, pfn, &to);
297 if (ret < 0) {
298 /*
299 * Shift range [to-end] to make room for one more element.
300 */
301 memmove((void *)&ca->array[to + 1],
302 (void *)&ca->array[to],
303 (ca->n - to) * sizeof(u64));
304
looks like it also needs a special case for when "to == MAX_ELEMS-1"
(we don't need to memmove).
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-17 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-16 1:20 [PATCH 1/2] ras: fix an off-by-one error in __find_elem() Cong Wang
2019-04-16 1:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] ras: close the race condition with timer Cong Wang
2019-04-16 9:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-16 17:09 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-16 17:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-16 18:00 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-16 18:06 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-16 9:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] ras: fix an off-by-one error in __find_elem() Borislav Petkov
2019-04-16 17:01 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-16 22:18 ` Luck, Tony
2019-04-16 23:18 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-16 23:28 ` Luck, Tony
2019-04-16 23:47 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-17 1:53 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2019-04-17 2:31 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-17 2:37 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-17 21:15 ` Luck, Tony
2019-04-18 22:54 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190417015351.GA28490@agluck-desk \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox