The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: mvebu: at least report the kzalloc failure
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:13:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190417121309.GA20864@osadl.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877ebsal7z.fsf@FE-laptop>

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:07:44PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
> 
> Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:39:57PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 05:56:31AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Note that this will trigger a checkpatch WARNING
> >> > "WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message"
> >> > but comparing the oops with an without the one-line pr_err I would
> >> > argue that it makes sense to include it:
> >> 
> >> Hi Nicholas
> >> 
> >> It might be worth adding this as a comment, so that newbies don't
> >> submit patches removing the pr_err() because of the checkpatch
> >> warning.
> >>
> > hmm... I think if we start doing that we would make quite a mess of
> > documentation in the kernel. Also note its a warning stating "possible 
> > unneceessary" - so I would not see the necessity.
> >
> > At most I would include a note on this in the commit message so that
> > anyone checking the origin would see that this is intenttional - assuming
> > that people modifying code would be using git blame to locate the
> > origin of any code...
> 
> Don't bother to send a new version I don't attempt to take this
> patch. As you pointed it is very unlikely that we get an error so early
> during the boot for a very small amount of memory.
> 
> If it happened then we have serious trouble and the message provided by
> the BUG() call will be more than enough.
>
yup - its a corner case - I'm trying to filter out those
cases that are actually in __init function returning void - as
those cases are, it seems, are generally cases where k{m,z}allocs
will not have explicit checking.

thx!
hofrat 

      reply	other threads:[~2019-04-17 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-16  3:56 [PATCH V2] ARM: mvebu: at least report the kzalloc failure Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-16 13:39 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-04-17 11:42   ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2019-04-17 12:07     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2019-04-17 12:13       ` Nicholas Mc Guire [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190417121309.GA20864@osadl.at \
    --to=der.herr@hofr.at \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox