From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
syzbot <syzbot+2b74da47f048a5046135@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING in notify_change
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:03:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418110356.GC28541@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190415235428.GS2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Tue 16-04-19 00:54:28, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 04:20:17PM -0700, Khazhismel Kumykov wrote:
> > I was able to reproduce this by setting security.capability xattr on a
> > blockdev file, then writing to it - when writing to the blockdev we
> > never lock the inode, so when we clear the capability we hit this
> > lockdep warning.
> >
> > Is the issue here that we can set this xattr in the first place so we
> > have to clear it at all? Or should we really be locking the inode for
> > blockdevs after all? I'm not too familiar, but my gut says former
>
> More interesting question is, WTF do we even touch that thing for
> bdev? The thing is, mknod will cheerfully create any number of
> different filesystem objects, all giving access to the same block
> device. Which of them should have that xattr removed? It makes
> no sense whatsoever; moreover, who *cares* about caps for block
> device in the first place?
>
> And if we did, what of another way to modify the block device?
> You know, mount it read-write...
Yes, Alexander Lochman has sent a patch to silence this warning back in
February [1] by just bailing out from file_remove_privs() for non-regular
files. But so far you've ignored that patch... Will you pick it up please?
Honza
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cbdc8071-de76-bb0a-6890-15ef21023a70@tu-dortmund.de
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-18 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-09 7:40 WARNING in notify_change syzbot
2018-06-11 10:33 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-04-15 23:20 ` Khazhismel Kumykov
2019-04-15 23:54 ` Al Viro
2019-04-18 11:03 ` Jan Kara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190418110356.GC28541@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=syzbot+2b74da47f048a5046135@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox