From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RAS/CEC: Add debugfs switch to disable at run time
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:15:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190422171532.GH21457@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7E90A404@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 03:59:16PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Err, this all sounds to me like the storm detection code should
> > *automatically* disable the CEC in such cases, I'd say.
>
> Sounds good. But we should distinguish storms that have many different
> addresses from storms that just ping a few addresses. CEC will see counts
> hit the threshold in the latter case, but it might not be able to take the pages
> offline (because they are locked, or in-use by kernel).
>
> So I think the change might be to the return value from NOTIFY_STOP to NOTIFY_DONE
> ... but only if we are in the middle of a storm AND the CEC array is full.
Well, regardless of this specific use case, isn't that a generic enough
action that we should do always? I mean, the aspect of falling back to
logging to external agent.
However, currently we don't signal that the CEC is full - we simply
remove the LRU element in cec_add_elem() before we insert the new one.
We can either return a specific retval to say, CEC is full and we had to
delete an elem or we can add a cec_is_full() accessor...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-22 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-18 22:02 [PATCH] RAS/CEC: Add debugfs switch to disable at run time Tony Luck
2019-04-18 22:51 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-18 23:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-18 23:58 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-19 0:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-20 5:43 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-20 9:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-20 18:18 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-20 18:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-20 19:08 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-22 16:29 ` Luck, Tony
2019-04-22 16:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-22 16:43 ` Luck, Tony
2019-04-22 17:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-22 17:23 ` Luck, Tony
2019-04-19 0:07 ` Luck, Tony
2019-04-19 0:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-19 15:04 ` Luck, Tony
2019-04-20 9:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-22 15:59 ` Luck, Tony
2019-04-22 17:15 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-04-22 17:44 ` Luck, Tony
2019-04-22 18:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-20 5:50 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-20 19:50 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190422171532.GH21457@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox