From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: uninline TASK_SIZE
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:38:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424103833.GB9642@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWtK4G7-o=pQoeyzLFTpiR9giGy2jYTU10xt6S8FsMk+Q@mail.gmail.com>
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Or am I missing some complication?
>
> Seems like a great idea to me.
>
> BTW, what the heck is up with get_gate_page()? I'm struggling to
> understand what it's even trying to do. If there's an architecture
> that allows a user program to mremap() or otherwise position its gate
> VMA between TASK_SIZE and TASK_SIZE_MAX, then that code is going to
> explode horribly.
I believe it was an old attempt from the times when the vsyscall area
*didn't* have a vma, at all, and only get_gate_page() kept the mmap
allocator from overlapping it with a user vma?
Should IMHO be entirely solved by the vma-ification of all things
vsyscall and vdso, and we can remove this remnant.
> A whole bunch of work in this direction is here:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/log/?h=x86/fixes
>
> It's almost entirely untested.
Please post it as patches once you are somewhat confident in the outcome
and general direction.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-21 16:06 [PATCH] x86_64: uninline TASK_SIZE Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-21 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-21 20:07 ` hpa
2019-04-21 21:10 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-22 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-22 14:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-22 22:09 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-23 0:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-23 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-23 17:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-24 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-04-22 22:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-21 22:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-22 22:40 ` [PATCH] " Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190424103833.GB9642@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox