The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: kpc2000: Use memset to initialize resources
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:57:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424185742.7797-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> (raw)

Clang warns:

drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:96:38: warning: suggest
braces around initialization of subobject [-Wmissing-braces]
    struct resource  resources[2] = {0};
                                     ^
                                     {}
drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:314:38: warning: suggest
braces around initialization of subobject [-Wmissing-braces]
    struct resource  resources[2] = {0};
                                     ^
                                     {}
2 warnings generated.

One way to fix these warnings is to add additional braces like Clang
suggests; however, there has been a bit of push back from some
maintainers, who just prefer memset as it is unambiguous, doesn't
depend on a particular compiler version, and properly initializes all
subobjects [1][2]. Do that here so there are no more warnings.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/022e41c0-8465-dc7a-a45c-64187ecd9684@amd.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181128.215241.702406654469517539.davem@davemloft.net/

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/455
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c
index ad2cc0a3bfa1..13f544f3c0b9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ void parse_core_table_entry(struct core_table_entry *cte, const u64 read_val, co
 int  probe_core_basic(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device *pcard, char *name, const struct core_table_entry cte)
 {
     struct mfd_cell  cell = {0};
-    struct resource  resources[2] = {0};
-    
+    struct resource  resources[2];
+
     struct kpc_core_device_platdata  core_pdata = {
         .card_id           = pcard->card_id,
         .build_version     = pcard->build_version,
@@ -112,6 +112,8 @@ int  probe_core_basic(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device *pcard, char *
     cell.id = core_num;
     cell.num_resources = 2;
     
+    memset(&resources, 0, sizeof(resources));
+
     resources[0].start = cte.offset;
     resources[0].end   = cte.offset + (cte.length - 1);
     resources[0].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
@@ -311,8 +313,8 @@ int  probe_core_uio(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device *pcard, char *na
 static int  create_dma_engine_core(struct kp2000_device *pcard, size_t engine_regs_offset, int engine_num, int irq_num)
 {
     struct mfd_cell  cell = {0};
-    struct resource  resources[2] = {0};
-    
+    struct resource  resources[2];
+
     dev_dbg(&pcard->pdev->dev, "create_dma_core(pcard = [%p], engine_regs_offset = %zx, engine_num = %d)\n", pcard, engine_regs_offset, engine_num);
     
     cell.platform_data = NULL;
@@ -321,6 +323,8 @@ static int  create_dma_engine_core(struct kp2000_device *pcard, size_t engine_re
     cell.name = KP_DRIVER_NAME_DMA_CONTROLLER;
     cell.num_resources = 2;
     
+    memset(&resources, 0, sizeof(resources));
+
     resources[0].start = engine_regs_offset;
     resources[0].end   = engine_regs_offset + (KPC_DMA_ENGINE_SIZE - 1);
     resources[0].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
-- 
2.21.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-04-24 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-24 18:57 Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2019-04-24 22:44 ` [PATCH] staging: kpc2000: Use memset to initialize resources Nick Desaulniers
2019-04-30  9:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-04-30 20:28   ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190424185742.7797-1-natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox