From: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
Cc: "bbrezillon@kernel.org" <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
"miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"marek.vasut@gmail.com" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>,
"nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com" <nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v14] mtd: rawnand: pl353: Add basic driver for arm pl353 smc nand interface
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 13:23:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425112337.wno2a6dccptffldz@laureti-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR02MB47797E4A5ADFC87DE4B04A81AF3C0@DM6PR02MB4779.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 05:04:38AM +0000, Naga Sureshkumar Relli wrote:
> > You previously used cond_resched (via nand_wait_ready) here. Why did you change it to
> > cpu_relax()?
> I just replicated the pl353_wait_for_ecc_done() API definition.
> But did you see any issue with this?
> Anyway I will replace it with cond_resched(), instead of cpu_releax()
This was an observation and it made me ask for reasons. I did not have
any practical issues here.
> Did you follow the same thing that you tried earlier?
> i.e. updated "nand-bus-width" property and "nand-ecc-mode" ?
Yes, I used the same device tree that made v13 partially work here.
> > After trying the driver, the flash chip was bricked. Neither the old driver nor the uboot-xlnx
> > driver nor the Xilinx fsbl are able to talk to the chip afterwards. This behaviour persists even
> > after a full power cycle. I'll try reinitializing the flash chip next. I've only seen this behaviour
> > once, so there is a slight chance that the cause is something else.
> Sometimes I also faced the same problem during driver development.
> What I did is, in standalone nandps driver example, I forcibly created BBT in the init and once
> it is done. I just reloaded the actual example. Then after wards u-boot and Linux are able to scan
> the BBT.
I confirm. It was just the BBT being bad. It can also be recreated using
u-boot with "nand scrib.chip".
I also spent some time reviewing the code and will send another mail
about that.
Helmut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-25 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-15 11:10 [LINUX PATCH v14] mtd: rawnand: pl353: Add basic driver for arm pl353 smc nand interface Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-04-23 12:45 ` Helmut Grohne
2019-04-24 5:04 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-04-25 11:23 ` Helmut Grohne [this message]
2019-04-25 11:23 ` Helmut Grohne
2019-04-29 8:08 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 11:31 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-04-29 12:18 ` Helmut Grohne
2019-04-29 12:35 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-13 10:18 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-13 11:37 ` Helmut Grohne
2019-04-29 12:23 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 12:43 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190425112337.wno2a6dccptffldz@laureti-dev \
--to=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=michals@xilinx.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=nagasure@xilinx.com \
--cc=nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox