public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm/tlb: Remove flush_tlb_info from the stack
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:48:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425194837.GB58719@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82E44F4A-E52D-4666-95B5-C6248A14A442@vmware.com>


* Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> wrote:

> > On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:29 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > * Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Move flush_tlb_info variables off the stack. This allows to align
> >> flush_tlb_info to cache-line and avoid potentially unnecessary cache
> >> line movements. It also allows to have a fixed virtual-to-physical
> >> translation of the variables, which reduces TLB misses.
> >> 
> >> Use per-CPU struct for flush_tlb_mm_range() and
> >> flush_tlb_kernel_range(). Add debug assertions to ensure there are
> >> no nested TLB flushes that might overwrite the per-CPU data. For
> >> arch_tlbbatch_flush() use a const struct.
> >> 
> >> Results when running a microbenchmarks that performs 10^6 MADV_DONTEED
> >> operations and touching a page, in which 3 additional threads run a
> >> busy-wait loop (5 runs, PTI and retpolines are turned off):
> >> 
> >> 			base		off-stack
> >> 			----		---------
> >> avg (usec/op)		1.629		1.570	(-3%)
> >> stddev			0.014		0.009
> >> 
> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> >> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
> >> 
> >> ---
> >> 
> >> v1->v2:
> >> - Initialize all flush_tlb_info fields [Andy]
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> >> index 487b8474c01c..aac191eb2b90 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> >> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static void flush_tlb_func_common(const struct flush_tlb_info *f,
> >> 	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[loaded_mm_asid].tlb_gen, mm_tlb_gen);
> >> }
> >> 
> >> -static void flush_tlb_func_local(void *info, enum tlb_flush_reason reason)
> >> +static void flush_tlb_func_local(const void *info, enum tlb_flush_reason reason)
> >> {
> >> 	const struct flush_tlb_info *f = info;
> >> 
> >> @@ -722,43 +722,81 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> >>  */
> >> unsigned long tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling __read_mostly = 33;
> >> 
> >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct flush_tlb_info, flush_tlb_info);
> >> +
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, flush_tlb_info_idx);
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> +static inline struct flush_tlb_info *get_flush_tlb_info(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >> +			unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> >> +			unsigned int stride_shift, bool freed_tables,
> >> +			u64 new_tlb_gen)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct flush_tlb_info *info = this_cpu_ptr(&flush_tlb_info);
> >> +
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * Ensure that the following code is non-reentrant and flush_tlb_info
> >> +	 * is not overwritten. This means no TLB flushing is initiated by
> >> +	 * interrupt handlers and machine-check exception handlers.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	BUG_ON(this_cpu_inc_return(flush_tlb_info_idx) != 1);
> >> +#endif
> > 
> > isn't this effectively VM_BUG_ON()?
> 
> Not exactly. When CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is off we get
> 
> 	#define VM_BUG_ON(cond) BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(cond)
> 
> This will cause the build to fail since flush_tlb_info_idx is not defined in
> when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is off.

Ugh, so VM_BUG_ON() should really be named VM_BUILD_BUG_ON()?

Anyway, agreed.

> >> +static inline void put_flush_tlb_info(void)
> >> +{
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> >> +	/* Complete reentrency prevention checks */
> >> +	barrier();
> >> +	this_cpu_dec(flush_tlb_info_idx);
> >> +#endif
> > 
> > In principle this_cpu_dec() should imply a compiler barrier?
> 
> this_cpu_dec() is eventually expanded to the macro of percpu_add_op(). And
> the inline assembly does not have a “memory” clobber, so I don’t think so.

I think that's a bug and PeterZ is fixing those.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-25 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-25 18:08 [PATCH v2] x86/mm/tlb: Remove flush_tlb_info from the stack Nadav Amit
2019-04-25 18:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-25 19:13 ` Nadav Amit
2019-04-25 19:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 19:42   ` Nadav Amit
2019-04-25 19:48     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-04-25 21:20       ` Nadav Amit
2019-04-26  7:53         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-26  8:37           ` Nadav Amit
2019-04-26 11:46             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190425194837.GB58719@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox