From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@nokia.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] panic: add an option to replay all the printk message in buffer
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 02:16:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190426171640.GA7413@tigerII.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190426164302.GA26127@tigerII.localdomain>
On (04/27/19 01:43), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> > The console waiter logic is effective but it does not always
> > work. The current console owner must be calling the console
> > drivers.
> >
> > > Hmm, we might have a bit of a problem here, maybe.
> >
> > Hmm, the printk() might wait forever when NMI stopped
> > the current console owner in the console driver code
> > or with the logbuf_lock taken.
>
> I guess this is why we re-init logbuf lock from panic,
> however, we don't do anything with the console_owner.
>
> > The console waiter logic might get solved by clearing
> > the console_owner in console_flush_on_panic(). It can't
> > be much worse, we already ignore console_lock() there, ...
Hmm, or maybe we are fine... console_waiter logic should work
before we send out stop IPI/NMI from panic CPU. When we call
flush_on_panic() console_unlock() clears console_owner, so
panic_print_sys_info() should not deadlock on console_owner.
It's probably only problematic if we kill a console_owner
CPU and then try to printk() (from smp_send_stop()) before
we do flush_on_panic()->console_unlock().
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-26 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-25 13:32 [PATCH v4] panic: add an option to replay all the printk message in buffer Feng Tang
2019-04-26 7:49 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-26 13:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-26 14:14 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-26 16:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-26 17:16 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2019-04-29 11:44 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-30 6:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190426171640.GA7413@tigerII.localdomain \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@nokia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox