From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_FAKE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FB8C43218 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 09:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C14B2087C for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 09:17:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1556356643; bh=RXvCiqxrKsd6av/gPwycKFehtN6eh+6QYsObHNJySyE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=jWskobA317mNnnuGDK3lrU/hH0vhIWCJP9BeK/wy1MkfxLx7vjc+KuROL4g1ZxIiC DM+Caqkz7gROj6Qhwx8X2P0HVgxDWtWvo5LxskgASxN/pGJzcdOLqjRmLK5AdUYFmC lWu+6mLgIcsmfSJyi8WsvepU10E1CInXSjQtkbGE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726335AbfD0JRW (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Apr 2019 05:17:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:38544 "EHLO mail-wr1-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725871AbfD0JRV (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Apr 2019 05:17:21 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id k16so7855141wrn.5 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 02:17:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8se/O6KFdh76pDCnsqVEe1RzLyU3I0mTGKKL1WGa/UM=; b=bDVQpYhRLAUg1qHbeiiwtTxqFPIwEw9pO8ROsCsxbrrNNPFar9+uE1zq2embcPEdIB OiKIo55BOKzBYAGzPAHCnHcqYppjThyXBYER8nz+1M2ZqzVqc9LxOb3p7CbFJ2Qif3UB ChsQ8llIji2jOAqfPgWkae01uvjexqOoh/veOTDDhyh9GEz0yUXuICuk3JhFXGw4lyJI WQZtUv7jLyCxNKxOnNQB0H2p+HQoKNP9dB2y+YSxEsE0KmR1wfte0el06F+usrpZ6hrQ 63M9pzZ/MKpd0M5NLmnHECU/dQvaTcR4U5621Vb2CYkx8U2h9pAPp3b4zD5QCdEi3Rcy O5Ow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8se/O6KFdh76pDCnsqVEe1RzLyU3I0mTGKKL1WGa/UM=; b=UX/o54O4kiK4iOTE6bne2wOiJBZQu+FOCCB/LmLShdkOzAc6C5evFCGZwezkU8r5Z+ CWCJAcoEfJ48/t2kJQCfAUT2JJ8B8wQRiMUJbIYEtT7aXUMTeT8GTV3z0LDAtK/3VPRY 5aNM9YZg1qdFuKenxRfzbtmYWyBEimvGZl7qzEiAOD0Z4QKzj3oudjGtlB/w+4iBS588 tQOUhKquXetmYl00XePlB7qH04+Jf2QfLK5zdDEGYdPQ8rd1HbizSXEL5SdyOauzGPed GYL1I5iBkuU9//8AlkBy96V888tVFOZrRf9cR6IMnTKAklFGEi8AmiuR3XGNXSxFp79Z +aUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUAD1lClPAPYA99W9p6TsQAmctECqrNNl7HMJGGi284PJhM8rx0 WsJaW6EYJIk8UwRT0qtDF6mvHTFA X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxi/83f/6D08Nmp+nqxpth2SsTw7eMsB77jVXsZajebc/+b3kQtbXWesw/MOPOzQ5R47ZEWrg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:edc8:: with SMTP id v8mr3523266wro.206.1556356640232; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 02:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e15sm4615293wrr.69.2019.04.27.02.17.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 27 Apr 2019 02:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:17:16 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Aubrey Li Cc: Julien Desfossez , Vineeth Remanan Pillai , Nishanth Aravamudan , Peter Zijlstra , Tim Chen , Thomas Gleixner , Paul Turner , Linus Torvalds , Linux List Kernel Mailing , Subhra Mazumdar , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Kees Cook , Greg Kerr , Phil Auld , Aaron Lu , Valentin Schneider , Mel Gorman , Pawan Gupta , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/17] Core scheduling v2 Message-ID: <20190427091716.GC99668@gmail.com> References: <20190424140013.GA14594@sinkpad> <20190425095508.GA8387@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Aubrey Li wrote: > I have the same environment setup above, for nosmt cases, I used > /sys interface Thomas mentioned, below is the result: > > NA/AVX baseline(std%) coresched(std%) +/- nosmt(std%) +/- > 1/1 1.987( 1.97%) 2.043( 1.76%) -2.84% 1.985( 1.70%) 0.12% > NA/AVX baseline(std%) coresched(std%) +/- nosmt(std%) +/- > 2/2 2.074( 1.16%) 2.057( 2.09%) 0.81% 2.072( 0.77%) 0.10% > NA/AVX baseline(std%) coresched(std%) +/- nosmt(std%) +/- > 4/4 2.140( 0.00%) 2.138( 0.49%) 0.09% 2.137( 0.89%) 0.12% > NA/AVX baseline(std%) coresched(std%) +/- nosmt(std%) +/- > 8/8 2.140( 0.00%) 2.144( 0.53%) -0.17% 2.140( 0.00%) 0.00% > NA/AVX baseline(std%) coresched(std%) +/- nosmt(std%) +/- > 16/16 2.361( 2.99%) 2.369( 2.65%) -0.30% 2.406( 2.53%) -1.87% > NA/AVX baseline(std%) coresched(std%) +/- nosmt(std%) +/- > 32/32 5.032( 8.68%) 3.485( 0.49%) 30.76% 6.002(27.21%) -19.27% > NA/AVX baseline(std%) coresched(std%) +/- nosmt(std%) +/- > 64/64 7.577(34.35%) 3.972(23.18%) 47.57% 18.235(14.14%) -140.68% > NA/AVX baseline(std%) coresched(std%) +/- nosmt(std%) +/- > 128/128 24.639(14.28%) 27.440( 8.24%) -11.37% 34.746( 6.92%) -41.02% > NA/AVX baseline(std%) coresched(std%) +/- nosmt(std%) +/- > 256/256 38.797( 8.59%) 44.067(16.20%) -13.58% 42.536( 7.57%) -9.64% What do these numbers mean? Are these latencies, i.e. lower is better? Thanks, Ingo