From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, keescook@chromium.org,
peterz@infradead.org, thgarnie@google.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, mike.travis@hpe.com,
frank.ramsay@hpe.com, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 2/2] x86/mm/KASLR: Fix the size of vmemmap section
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 21:54:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190428185408.macoxstmy5awsago@kshutemo-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190422091045.GB3584@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 05:10:45PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> kernel_randomize_memory() hardcodes the size of vmemmap section as 1 TB,
> to support the maximum amount of system RAM in 4-level paging mode, 64 TB.
>
> However, 1 TB is not enough for vmemmap in 5-level paging mode. Assuming
> the size of struct page is 64 Bytes, to support 4 PB system RAM in 5-level,
> 64 TB of vmemmap area is needed. The wrong hardcoding may cause vmemmap
> stamping into the following cpu_entry_area section, if KASLR puts vmemmap
> very close to cpu_entry_area , and the actual area of vmemmap is much bigger
> than 1 TB.
>
> So here calculate the actual size of vmemmap region, then align up to 1 TB
> boundary. In 4-level it's always 1 TB. In 5-level it's adjusted on demand.
> The current code reserves 0.5 PB for vmemmap in 5-level. In this new method,
> the left space can be saved to join randomization to increase the entropy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2->v3:
> Fix typo Boris pointed out.
>
> arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> index 387d4ed25d7c..4679a0075048 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static __initdata struct kaslr_memory_region {
> } kaslr_regions[] = {
> { &page_offset_base, 0 },
> { &vmalloc_base, 0 },
> - { &vmemmap_base, 1 },
> + { &vmemmap_base, 0 },
> };
>
> /* Get size in bytes used by the memory region */
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void __init kernel_randomize_memory(void)
> unsigned long rand, memory_tb;
> struct rnd_state rand_state;
> unsigned long remain_entropy;
> + unsigned long vmemmap_size;
>
> vaddr_start = pgtable_l5_enabled() ? __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE_L5 : __PAGE_OFFSET_BASE_L4;
> vaddr = vaddr_start;
> @@ -109,6 +110,14 @@ void __init kernel_randomize_memory(void)
> if (memory_tb < kaslr_regions[0].size_tb)
> kaslr_regions[0].size_tb = memory_tb;
>
> + /**
Nit: that is weird style for inline comment.
> + * Calculate how many TB vmemmap region needs, and aligned to
> + * 1TB boundary.
> + */
> + vmemmap_size = (kaslr_regions[0].size_tb << (TB_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)) *
> + sizeof(struct page);
Hm. Don't we need to take into account alignment requirements for struct
page here? I'm worried about some exotic debug kernel config where
sizeof(struct page) doesn't satify __alignof__(struct page).
> + kaslr_regions[2].size_tb = DIV_ROUND_UP(vmemmap_size, 1UL << TB_SHIFT);
> +
> /* Calculate entropy available between regions */
> remain_entropy = vaddr_end - vaddr_start;
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kaslr_regions); i++)
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-29 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-14 7:28 [PATCH v2 RESEND 0/2] x86/mm/KASLR: Fix the wrong size of memory sections Baoquan He
2019-04-14 7:28 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/2] x86/mm/KASLR: Fix the size of the direct mapping section Baoquan He
2019-04-15 18:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-17 8:35 ` Baoquan He
2019-04-17 15:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-17 22:42 ` Baoquan He
2019-04-18 8:52 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Baoquan He
2019-04-14 7:28 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 2/2] x86/mm/KASLR: Fix the size of vmemmap section Baoquan He
2019-04-15 19:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-17 8:39 ` Baoquan He
2019-04-26 9:23 ` Baoquan He
2019-04-26 10:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-26 10:18 ` Baoquan He
2019-04-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v3 " Baoquan He
2019-04-22 9:14 ` Baoquan He
2019-04-28 18:54 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2019-04-29 8:12 ` Baoquan He
2019-04-29 13:16 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190428185408.macoxstmy5awsago@kshutemo-mobl1 \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=frank.ramsay@hpe.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox