From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032BBC43219 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C0B2075E for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728753AbfD2Qh5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:37:57 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:48772 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728600AbfD2Qh5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:37:57 -0400 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 512) id DE1B1808E3; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:37:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:37:53 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Marek Behun Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 (drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia) Message-ID: <20190429163753.GA16782@amd> References: <20190429190354.0d5e2e93@canb.auug.org.au> <20190429153200.GA11761@amd> <20190429173842.06f02852@nic.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190429173842.06f02852@nic.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon 2019-04-29 17:38:42, Marek Behun wrote: > I am sending patch only adding the I2C dep. Theoretically it is > possible that someone uses the same I2C API in their microcontroller on > another architecture. Theoretically. But we both now that probability of that is very low, and that likely driver would need other updates, too... right? Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlzHKGEACgkQMOfwapXb+vJBnACeN70fWubChYlk70/V8Tb9hnNv 8yAAn2xWQhTs6fpmAXSZ55//Tlc6mz7M =2KPW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN--