From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Alex G <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Austin Bolen <austin_bolen@dell.com>,
Alexandru Gagniuc <alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Shyam Iyer <Shyam_Iyer@dell.com>, Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth notification"
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:05:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430180508.GB25654@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430161151.GB145057@google.com>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:11:51AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > I'm not convinced a revert is the best call.
>
> I have very limited options at this stage of the release, but I'd be
> glad to hear suggestions. My concern is that if we release v5.1
> as-is, we'll spend a lot of energy on those false positives.
May be too late now if the revert is queued up, but I think this feature
should have been a default 'false' Kconfig bool rather than always on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 18:56 [PATCH] Revert "PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth Bjorn Helgaas
2019-04-29 18:56 ` [PATCH] Revert "PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth notification" Bjorn Helgaas
2019-04-29 19:21 ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-30 1:07 ` Alex G
2019-04-30 16:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-04-30 18:05 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2019-04-30 18:18 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-01 2:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-05-01 13:16 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-30 23:09 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190430180508.GB25654@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=Shyam_Iyer@dell.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com \
--cc=austin_bolen@dell.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
--cc=okaya@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox