From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Alex G <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Austin Bolen <austin_bolen@dell.com>,
Alexandru Gagniuc <alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Shyam Iyer <Shyam_Iyer@dell.com>, Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth notification"
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 21:12:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190501021249.GD145057@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430181813.GC25654@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:18:13PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:05:09PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:11:51AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > I'm not convinced a revert is the best call.
> > >
> > > I have very limited options at this stage of the release, but I'd be
> > > glad to hear suggestions. My concern is that if we release v5.1
> > > as-is, we'll spend a lot of energy on those false positives.
> >
> > May be too late now if the revert is queued up, but I think this feature
> > should have been a default 'false' Kconfig bool rather than always on.
Since this feature currently just adds a message in dmesg, which we
don't really consider a stable API, I think a Kconfig switch is a
reasonable option.
If you send me a signed-off-by for the following patch, I can apply it:
commit 302b77157e66
Author: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Apr 30 12:18:13 2019 -0600
PCI/LINK: Add Kconfig option (default off)
e8303bb7a75c ("PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth
notification") added dmesg logging whenever a link changes speed or width
to a state that is considered degraded. Unfortunately, it cannot
differentiate signal integrity-related link changes from those
intentionally initiated by an endpoint driver, including drivers that may
live in userspace or VMs when making use of vfio-pci. Some GPU drivers
actively manage the link state to save power, which generates a stream of
messages like this:
vfio-pci 0000:07:00.0: 32.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 2.5 GT/s x16 link at 0000:00:02.0 (capable of 64.000 Gb/s with 5 GT/s x16 link)
Since we can't distinguish the intentional changes from the signal
integrity issues, leave the reporting turned off by default. Add a Kconfig
option to turn it on if desired.
Fixes: e8303bb7a75c ("PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth
notification")
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig
index 5cbdbca904ac..4a094f0d2856 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig
@@ -142,3 +142,12 @@ config PCIE_PTM
This is only useful if you have devices that support PTM, but it
is safe to enable even if you don't.
+
+config PCIE_BW
+ bool "PCI Express Bandwidth Change Notification"
+ default n
+ depends on PCIEPORTBUS
+ help
+ This enables PCI Express Bandwidth Change Notification. If
+ you know link width or rate changes occur only to correct
+ unreliable links, you may answer Y.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/Makefile b/drivers/pci/pcie/Makefile
index f1d7bc1e5efa..d356a5bdb158 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/Makefile
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
# Makefile for PCI Express features and port driver
pcieportdrv-y := portdrv_core.o portdrv_pci.o err.o
-pcieportdrv-y += bw_notification.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS) += pcieportdrv.o
@@ -13,3 +12,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIEAER_INJECT) += aer_inject.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_PME) += pme.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC) += dpc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_PTM) += ptm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_BW) := bw_notification.o
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-01 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 18:56 [PATCH] Revert "PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth Bjorn Helgaas
2019-04-29 18:56 ` [PATCH] Revert "PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth notification" Bjorn Helgaas
2019-04-29 19:21 ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-30 1:07 ` Alex G
2019-04-30 16:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-04-30 18:05 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-30 18:18 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-01 2:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-05-01 13:16 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-30 23:09 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190501021249.GD145057@google.com \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Shyam_Iyer@dell.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com \
--cc=austin_bolen@dell.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
--cc=okaya@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox