From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>,
bleung@chromium.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, gwendal@chromium.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
groeck@chromium.org, Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] power: supply: add input voltage limit property
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 23:12:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502211252.GA19144@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190502210138.ekrjvg4jex5x2tbo@earth.universe>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2417 bytes --]
Hi!
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:42:30AM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> > On 16/4/19 9:19, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >> This patch exposes a new property, similar to input current limit, to
> > >> re-configure the maximum voltage from the external supply at runtime
> > >> based on system-level knowledge or user input.
> > >
> > > Well, and I suspect it should expose input power limit, not input
> > > voltage limit.
> >
> > Oh, ok, I thought we were agree that input voltage had sense after had some
> > discussion in v3. Seems that no, let me try to give you another example...
> >
> > > DC-DC convertor efficiency normally does not much depend on input
> > > voltage....
> >
> > As we said we have a heat "problem" due the internal voltage conversions.
> >
> > Lets assume you have a linear regulator instead with a Vin range from 5V to 9V
> > and we want an output of 3.3V/1A
> >
> > For 9V:
> > Input power : P(in) = 9V x 1A = 9W
> > Output power: P(out) = 3.3V x 1A = 3.3W
> > Regulator power dissipated: P(reg) = P(in) - P(out) = 9W - 3.3W = 5.7W
> >
> > For 5V:
> > Input power : P(in) = 5V x 1A = 5W
> > Output power: P(out) = 3.3V x 1A = 3.3W
> > Regulator power dissipated: P(reg) = P(in) - P(out) = 5W - 3.3W = 1,7W
> >
> > In the first case the regulator needs to dissipate more power, hence the
> > temperature is greater than the second case.
>
> I would be surprised, if a linear regulator is being used in this
> place :) That would basically render functionality of higher voltage
> completley useless and a good reason to always limit to 5V. For the
> generic case I agree with Pavel, that control over the power (voltage
> * current) is the better choice. Still I believe it makes sense to
> have a control knob for the voltage available, since some hardware
> designs suck.
>
> For example the bad hardware design might be the remote side,
> that has issues providing some voltages and this would make it
> possible to debug that.
Ok, I agree it might be useful _somewhere_, mostly for hardware
debugging. But before if we add voltage_limit, lets add power_limit,
too; and for problems that can be solved using power_limit, lets use
power_limit...
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-15 22:00 [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] power: supply: add input voltage limit property Enric Balletbo i Serra
2019-04-15 22:00 ` [RESEND PATCH v3 2/2] power: supply: cros: allow to set input voltage and current limit Enric Balletbo i Serra
2019-04-16 7:19 ` [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] power: supply: add input voltage limit property Pavel Machek
2019-04-16 8:42 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2019-05-02 21:01 ` Sebastian Reichel
2019-05-02 21:12 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190502211252.GA19144@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=snanda@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox