public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	poza@codeaurora.org, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: iproc: Add sorted dma ranges resource entries to host bridge
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:12:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506211208.GA156478@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1556892334-16270-4-git-send-email-srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>

On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 07:35:34PM +0530, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> The IPROC host controller allows only a subset of physical address space
> as target of inbound PCI memory transactions addresses.
> 
> PCIe devices memory transactions targeting memory regions that
> are not allowed for inbound transactions in the host controller
> are rejected by the host controller and cannot reach the upstream
> buses.
> 
> Firmware device tree description defines the DMA ranges that are
> addressable by devices DMA transactions; parse the device tree
> dma-ranges property and add its ranges to the PCI host bridge dma_ranges
> list; the iova_reserve_pci_windows() call in the driver will reserve the
> IOVA address ranges that are not addressable (ie memory holes in the
> dma-ranges set) so that they are not allocated to PCI devices for DMA
> transfers.
> 
> All allowed address ranges are listed in dma-ranges DT parameter.
> 
> Example:
> 
> dma-ranges = < \
>   0x43000000 0x00 0x80000000 0x00 0x80000000 0x00 0x80000000 \
>   0x43000000 0x08 0x00000000 0x08 0x00000000 0x08 0x00000000 \
>   0x43000000 0x80 0x00000000 0x80 0x00000000 0x40 0x00000000>
> 
> In the above example of dma-ranges, memory address from
> 
> 0x0 - 0x80000000,
> 0x100000000 - 0x800000000,
> 0x1000000000 - 0x8000000000 and
> 0x10000000000 - 0xffffffffffffffff.
> 
> are not allowed to be used as inbound addresses.
> 
> Based-on-patch-by: Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>
> [lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com: updated commit log]
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> index c20fd6b..94ba5c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> @@ -1146,11 +1146,43 @@ static int iproc_pcie_setup_ib(struct iproc_pcie *pcie,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +iproc_pcie_add_dma_range(struct device *dev, struct list_head *resources,
> +			 struct of_pci_range *range)

Just FYI, I cherry-picked these commits from Lorenzo's branch to fix
the formatting of this prototype to match the rest of the file, e.g.:

>  static int iproc_pcie_map_dma_ranges(struct iproc_pcie *pcie)
> ...
>  static int iproce_pcie_get_msi(struct iproc_pcie *pcie,

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-06 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-03 14:05 [PATCH v6 0/3] PCIe Host request to reserve IOVA Srinath Mannam
2019-05-03 14:05 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] PCI: Add dma_ranges window list Srinath Mannam
2019-05-03 14:05 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] iommu/dma: Reserve IOVA for PCIe inaccessible DMA address Srinath Mannam
2019-05-03 14:05 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: iproc: Add sorted dma ranges resource entries to host bridge Srinath Mannam
2019-05-06 21:12   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-05-07  9:41     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-05-07  9:55       ` Srinath Mannam
2019-05-03 15:53 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] PCIe Host request to reserve IOVA Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-05-03 16:06   ` Srinath Mannam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190506211208.GA156478@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=poza@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=srinath.mannam@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox