From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5924C04A6B for ; Wed, 8 May 2019 17:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9557E21530 for ; Wed, 8 May 2019 17:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727124AbfEHRwk (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2019 13:52:40 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:41044 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726506AbfEHRwk (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2019 13:52:40 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C491667358; Wed, 8 May 2019 19:52:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 19:52:19 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jon Mason Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Muli Ben-Yehuda , x86@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: status of the calgary iommu driver Message-ID: <20190508175219.GA32030@lst.de> References: <20190409140347.GA11524@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 06:42:39PM +0100, Jon Mason wrote: > These systems were plentiful for 2-4 years after the original series > made it in. After that, the Intel and AMD IOMMUs should were shipped > and were superior to this chip. So, even in systems where these might > be present, the AMD/Intel ones should be used (unknown if they were > shipped on the same ones, as both Muli and I have left IBM). > > You thinking about removing the code? I'm wondering if we could remove it. I've been done lots of maintainance on various dma mapping and iommu drivers, and the calgary one seems like it didn't get a whole lot of love, and I've not seen any recent users, so I mostly wonder if I should bother at all.