[PATCH] doc/rcu: Correct field_count field naming in examples

Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-05-05T02:04:06Z

I believe this field should be called field_count instead of file_count.
Correct the doc with the same.

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
index adb5a3782846..190e666fc359 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ otherwise, the added fields would need to be filled in):
list_for_each_entry(e, list, list) {
if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &e->rule)) {
e->rule.action = newaction;
- e->rule.file_count = newfield_count;
+ e->rule.field_count = newfield_count;
write_unlock(&auditsc_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ RCU ("read-copy update") its name. The RCU code is as follows:
return -ENOMEM;
audit_copy_rule(&ne->rule, &e->rule);
ne->rule.action = newaction;
- ne->rule.file_count = newfield_count;
+ ne->rule.field_count = newfield_count;
list_replace_rcu(&e->list, &ne->list);
call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
return 0;
--
2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a-goog