From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>,
Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 07:36:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190513133611.GA15318@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190511072258.GB14764@lst.de>
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 12:22:58AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> A couple nitpicks, mostly leftover from the previous iteration
> (I didn't see replies to those comments from you, despite seeing
> a reply to my mail, assuming it didn't get lost):
I thought you just meant the freeze/unfreeze sequence. I removed that
part entirely, but yes, I can move all of this from the core. I will
just need to export 'nvme_set_features'
> > +int nvme_set_power(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, unsigned ps)
> > +{
> > + return nvme_set_features(ctrl, NVME_FEAT_POWER_MGMT, ps, NULL, 0, NULL);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_set_power);
> > +
> > +int nvme_get_power(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u32 *result)
> > +{
> > + struct nvme_command c;
> > + union nvme_result res;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!result)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + memset(&c, 0, sizeof(c));
> > + c.features.opcode = nvme_admin_get_features;
> > + c.features.fid = cpu_to_le32(NVME_FEAT_POWER_MGMT);
> > +
> > + ret = __nvme_submit_sync_cmd(ctrl->admin_q, &c, &res,
> > + NULL, 0, 0, NVME_QID_ANY, 0, 0, false);
> > + if (ret >= 0)
> > + *result = le32_to_cpu(res.u32);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_get_power);
>
> At this point I'd rather see those in the PCIe driver. While the
> power state feature is generic in the spec I don't see it actually
> being used anytime anywhere else any time soon.
>
> But maybe we can add a nvme_get_features helper ala nvme_set_features
> in the core to avoid a little boilerplate code for the future?
Sounds good.
> > + ret = nvme_set_power(&dev->ctrl, dev->ctrl.npss);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
>
> I can't find any wording in the spec that guarantees the highest
> numerical power state is the deepest. But maybe I'm just missing
> something as such an ordering would be really helpful?
I actually only noticed APST made this assumption, and I had to search
the spec to see where it calls this out. It is in section 8.4:
Power states are contiguously numbered starting with zero such that
each subsequent power state consumes less than or equal to the maximum
power consumed in the previous state.
> > static int nvme_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > struct nvme_dev *ndev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Try to use nvme if the device supports host managed power settings
> > + * and platform firmware is not involved.
> > + */
>
> This just comments that what, but I think we need a why here as the
> what is fairly obvious..
Sounds good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-13 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-10 21:29 [PATCH] nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend Keith Busch
2019-05-11 0:52 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-13 14:24 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-13 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-13 14:43 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-13 14:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-13 14:55 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-13 15:05 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-13 15:04 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-14 8:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-14 22:16 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-15 9:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-13 14:37 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-13 14:54 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-13 14:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-13 15:16 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-13 17:16 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-13 18:16 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-13 18:01 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-14 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-11 1:33 ` Edmund Nadolski
2019-05-11 7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-12 14:34 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-05-13 13:36 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2019-05-12 6:06 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-12 14:30 ` Minwoo Im
2019-05-12 15:20 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-13 13:47 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190513133611.GA15318@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox