RE: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get usb_role_switch by node

Biju Das
2019-05-20T09:45:54Z

Hi Heikki,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get usb_role_switch by
> node
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 08:06:41AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > Hi Heikki,
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get
> > > usb_role_switch by node
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:39:11AM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 16:05 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:37:36PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:47:21PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > > > > > > Add fwnode_usb_role_switch_get() to make easier to get
> > > > > > > usb_role_switch by fwnode which register it.
> > > > > > > It's useful when there is not device_connection registered
> > > > > > > between two drivers and only knows the fwnode which register
> > > > > > > usb_role_switch.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
> > > > > > > Tested-by: Biju Das <biju.das@bp.renesas.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Hold on. I just noticed Rob's comment on patch 2/6, where he
> > > > > points out that you don't need to use device graph since the
> > > > > controller is the parent of the connector. Doesn't that mean you
> > > > > don't really need this API?
> > > > No, I still need it.
> > > > The change is about the way how to get fwnode; when use device
> > > > graph, get fwnode by of_graph_get_remote_node(); but now will get
> > > > fwnode by of_get_parent();
> > >
> > > OK, I get that, but I'm still not convinced about if something like
> > > this function is needed at all. I also have concerns regarding how
> > > you are using the function. I'll explain in comment to the patch 5/6 in this
> series...
> >
> > FYI, Currently I am also using this api in my patch series.
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10944637/
>
> Yes, and I have the same question for you I jusb asked in comment I added
> to the patch 5/6 of this series. Why isn't usb_role_switch_get() enough?

Currently no issue. It will work with this api as well, since the port node is part of controller node.
For eg:-
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10944627/

However if any one adds port node inside the connector node, then this api may won't work as expected.
Currently I get below error

[ 2.299703] OF: graph: no port node found in /soc/i2c@e6500000/hd3ss3220@47

For eg:-

hd3ss3220@47 {
compatible = "ti,hd3ss3220";
...
....
usb_con: connector {
....
....
port {
hd3ss3220_ep: endpoint@0 {
reg = <0>;
remote-endpoint = <&usb3peri_role_switch>;
};
};
};
};

Regards,
Biju