From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] printk: factor out register_console() code
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 15:51:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523065144.GA18333@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190515143631.vuhbda6btucrkskx@pathway.suse.cz>
Hello,
On (05/15/19 16:36), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> >
> > console_unlock();
> > console_sysfs_notify();
> > + console_lock();
>
> I have got an idea how to get rid of this weirdness:
>
> 1. The check for bcon seems to be just an optimization. There is not need
> to remove boot consoles when there are none.
>
> 2. The condition (newcon->flags & (CON_CONSDEV|CON_BOOT)) == CON_CONSDEV)
> is valid only when the preferred console was really added.
>
> Therefore we could move the code to a separate function, e.g.
>
> void unregister_boot_consoles(void)
> {
> struct console *bcon;
>
> console_lock();
> for_each_console(bcon)
> if (bcon->flags & CON_BOOT)
> __unregister_console(bcon);
> }
> console_unlock();
> console_sysfs_notify();
> }
>
> Then we could do something like:
>
> void register_console(struct console *newcon)
> {
> bool newcon_is_preferred = false;
>
> console_lock();
> __register_console(newcon);
> if ((newcon->flags & (CON_CONSDEV|CON_BOOT)) == CON_CONSDEV)
> newcon_is_preferred = true;
> console_unlock();
> console_sysfs_notify();
>
> /*
> * By unregistering the bootconsoles after we enable the real console
> * we get the "console xxx enabled" message on all the consoles -
> * boot consoles, real consoles, etc - this is to ensure that end
> * users know there might be something in the kernel's log buffer that
> * went to the bootconsole (that they do not see on the real console)
> */
> if (newcon_is_preferred && !keep_bootcon)
> unregister_boot_consoles();
> }
>
> How does that sound?
Hmm, may be I'm missing something. I think that the 'weirdness'
is still needed. This
console_lock();
__unregister_console(bcon); // pr_info("%sconsole disabled\n")
console_unlock();
is going to change the visible behaviour - we need to show
pr_info("%sconsole [%s%d] disabled\n") on all consoles, especially
on the console which we are disabling. Who knows, maybe that's the
last remaining properly working console. Doing __unregister_console()
under console_sem will end up in a lost/missing message on bcon (or
on any other console we are unregistering).
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-23 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-26 5:32 [PATCHv2 0/4] Access console drivers list under console_sem Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-26 5:32 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] printk: factor out __unregister_console() code Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-05-15 13:34 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-26 5:33 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] printk: remove invalid register_console() comment Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-05-15 13:38 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-26 5:33 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] printk: factor out register_console() code Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-05-15 14:36 ` Petr Mladek
2019-05-23 6:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2019-05-27 11:42 ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-26 5:33 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] printk: make sure we always print console disabled message Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-26 5:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-05-15 14:47 ` Petr Mladek
2019-05-23 6:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-05-27 12:45 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190523065144.GA18333@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox