public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86/mm/tlb: Refactor common code into flush_tlb_on_cpus()
Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 01:22:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190525082203.6531-5-namit@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190525082203.6531-1-namit@vmware.com>

arch_tlbbatch_flush() and flush_tlb_mm_range() have very similar code,
which is effectively the same. Extract the mutual code into a new
function flush_tlb_on_cpus().

There is one functional change, which should not affect correctness:
flush_tlb_mm_range compared loaded_mm and the mm to figure out if local
flush is needed. Instead, the common code would look at the mm_cpumask()
which should give the same result. Performance should not be affected,
since this cpumask should not change in such a frequency that would
introduce cache contention.

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 7f61431c75fb..afd2859a6966 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -733,7 +733,11 @@ static inline struct flush_tlb_info *get_flush_tlb_info(struct mm_struct *mm,
 			unsigned int stride_shift, bool freed_tables,
 			u64 new_tlb_gen)
 {
-	struct flush_tlb_info *info = this_cpu_ptr(&flush_tlb_info);
+	struct flush_tlb_info *info;
+
+	preempt_disable();
+
+	info = this_cpu_ptr(&flush_tlb_info);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
 	/*
@@ -761,6 +765,23 @@ static inline void put_flush_tlb_info(void)
 	barrier();
 	this_cpu_dec(flush_tlb_info_idx);
 #endif
+	preempt_enable();
+}
+
+static void flush_tlb_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *cpumask,
+			      const struct flush_tlb_info *info)
+{
+	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+	if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, cpumask)) {
+		lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
+		local_irq_disable();
+		flush_tlb_func_local(info, TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN);
+		local_irq_enable();
+	}
+
+	if (cpumask_any_but(cpumask, this_cpu) < nr_cpu_ids)
+		flush_tlb_others(cpumask, info);
 }
 
 void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
@@ -769,9 +790,6 @@ void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
 {
 	struct flush_tlb_info *info;
 	u64 new_tlb_gen;
-	int cpu;
-
-	cpu = get_cpu();
 
 	/* Should we flush just the requested range? */
 	if ((end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL) ||
@@ -786,18 +804,9 @@ void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
 	info = get_flush_tlb_info(mm, start, end, stride_shift, freed_tables,
 				  new_tlb_gen);
 
-	if (mm == this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm)) {
-		lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
-		local_irq_disable();
-		flush_tlb_func_local(info, TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN);
-		local_irq_enable();
-	}
-
-	if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), cpu) < nr_cpu_ids)
-		flush_tlb_others(mm_cpumask(mm), info);
+	flush_tlb_on_cpus(mm_cpumask(mm), info);
 
 	put_flush_tlb_info();
-	put_cpu();
 }
 
 
@@ -832,13 +841,11 @@ void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 	} else {
 		struct flush_tlb_info *info;
 
-		preempt_disable();
 		info = get_flush_tlb_info(NULL, start, end, 0, false, 0);
 
 		on_each_cpu(do_kernel_range_flush, info, 1);
 
 		put_flush_tlb_info();
-		preempt_enable();
 	}
 }
 
@@ -856,21 +863,11 @@ static const struct flush_tlb_info full_flush_tlb_info = {
 
 void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 {
-	int cpu = get_cpu();
-
-	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) {
-		lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
-		local_irq_disable();
-		flush_tlb_func_local(&full_flush_tlb_info, TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN);
-		local_irq_enable();
-	}
-
-	if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids)
-		flush_tlb_others(&batch->cpumask, &full_flush_tlb_info);
+	preempt_disable();
+	flush_tlb_on_cpus(&batch->cpumask, &full_flush_tlb_info);
+	preempt_enable();
 
 	cpumask_clear(&batch->cpumask);
-
-	put_cpu();
 }
 
 static ssize_t tlbflush_read_file(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf,
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-25  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-25  8:21 [RFC PATCH 0/6] x86/mm: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently Nadav Amit
2019-05-25  8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] smp: Remove smp_call_function() and on_each_cpu() return values Nadav Amit
2019-05-25  8:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] cpumask: Purify cpumask_next() Nadav Amit
2019-05-25  8:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-27  8:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-27 17:34     ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-25  8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] smp: Run functions concurrently in smp_call_function_many() Nadav Amit
2019-05-27  9:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-27 17:39     ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-25  8:22 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2019-05-27  9:24   ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86/mm/tlb: Refactor common code into flush_tlb_on_cpus() Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-27 18:59     ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-27 19:14       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-25  8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently Nadav Amit
2019-05-25  8:38   ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-25  8:54   ` Juergen Gross
2019-05-27  9:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-27 10:21       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-27 12:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-27 12:45           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-27 17:49       ` Nadav Amit
2019-05-25  8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] x86/mm/tlb: Optimize local TLB flushes Nadav Amit
2019-05-27  8:28 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] x86/mm: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-27  9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190525082203.6531-5-namit@vmware.com \
    --to=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox