From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, williams@redhat.com,
daniel@bristot.me,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] softirq: Use preempt_latency_stop/start to trace preemption
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 05:30:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190529093056.GA146079@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6bb4705efb0c01c11008ae3c46bc74555245303.1559051152.git.bristot@redhat.com>
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:16:22PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> prempt_disable/enable tracepoints occurs only in the preemption
> enabled <-> disable transition. As preempt_latency_stop() and
> preempt_latency_start() already do this control, avoid code
> duplication by using these functions in the softirq code as well.
>
> RFC: Should we move preempt_latency_start/preempt_latency_stop
> to a trace source file... or even a header?
Yes, I think so. Also this patch changes CALLER_ADDR0 passed to the
tracepoint because there's one more level of a non-inlined function call
in the call chain right? Very least the changelog should document this
change in functional behavior, IMO.
Looks like a nice change otherwise, thanks!
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>
> Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++--
> kernel/softirq.c | 13 +++++--------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 874c427742a9..8c0b414e45dc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3152,7 +3152,7 @@ static inline void sched_tick_stop(int cpu) { }
> * If the value passed in is equal to the current preempt count
> * then we just disabled preemption. Start timing the latency.
> */
> -static inline void preempt_latency_start(int val)
> +void preempt_latency_start(int val)
> {
> if (preempt_count() == val) {
> unsigned long ip = get_lock_parent_ip();
> @@ -3189,7 +3189,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(preempt_count_add);
> * If the value passed in equals to the current preempt count
> * then we just enabled preemption. Stop timing the latency.
> */
> -static inline void preempt_latency_stop(int val)
> +void preempt_latency_stop(int val)
> {
> if (preempt_count() == val)
> trace_preempt_on(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> index 2c3382378d94..c9ad89c3dfed 100644
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ static bool ksoftirqd_running(unsigned long pending)
> * where hardirqs are disabled legitimately:
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
> +extern void preempt_latency_start(int val);
> +extern void preempt_latency_stop(int val);
> void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -130,12 +132,8 @@ void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
> trace_softirqs_off(ip);
> raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> - if (preempt_count() == cnt) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> - current->preempt_disable_ip = get_lock_parent_ip();
> -#endif
> - trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
> - }
> + preempt_latency_start(cnt);
> +
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__local_bh_disable_ip);
> #endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS */
> @@ -144,8 +142,7 @@ static void __local_bh_enable(unsigned int cnt)
> {
> lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>
> - if (preempt_count() == cnt)
> - trace_preempt_on(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
> + preempt_latency_stop(cnt);
>
> if (softirq_count() == (cnt & SOFTIRQ_MASK))
> trace_softirqs_on(_RET_IP_);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-29 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-28 15:16 [RFC 0/3] preempt_tracer: Fix preempt_disable tracepoint Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-28 15:16 ` [RFC 1/3] softirq: Use preempt_latency_stop/start to trace preemption Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-29 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 9:30 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2019-05-29 12:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-04 10:39 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-06-04 12:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-28 15:16 ` [RFC 2/3] preempt_tracer: Disable IRQ while starting/stopping due to a preempt_counter change Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-29 8:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 9:40 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-29 10:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 12:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-29 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 13:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-29 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 13:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-29 13:51 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-29 18:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 10:20 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-31 7:47 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-06-04 10:12 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-06-04 15:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-05 15:16 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-05-28 15:16 ` [RFC 3/3] preempt_tracer: Use a percpu variable to control traceble calls Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2019-05-29 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 9:48 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190529093056.GA146079@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@bristot.me \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiny.windzz@gmail.com \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox