From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83745C04AB6 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 07:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587D327C9D for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 07:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="JnySwxG8" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727341AbfFCHYF (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 03:24:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:39851 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726272AbfFCHYE (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 03:24:04 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id x4so10827967wrt.6 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:24:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=6ntfRdLCd+I6+09GVECx+yr8Tcx+Tf8xlZvw6c2Yxtw=; b=JnySwxG8AeComsjWCZPtzks1WfiiKMFfES+2KGsgVvDO7sBNEbujRxKnusEaaYU0uW z1KtHAi7P1RAMiKxpuWf4DjizGH/MTltg0NHvjsci8/kJHvGus13A4FCUnpkhSc7isOc Mvc1SJrlMwTbdGp43iH6V69MxdKhoZR20bfoGZ0VaHTZ5aooZhvfqJa65R3RjRbKwMHX ipA6fzS4frednIcJP+jMCH9DNKNv8rQmBKaExIvcsKQb2C/K94+W6XGakTJByGHYybDr 8Yd+B6rNmdPB57o3sD8G5xZdtEYTYSjDAtybvxcTbR1P7UFjA18za29nlm+iedBEnEz0 TPGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6ntfRdLCd+I6+09GVECx+yr8Tcx+Tf8xlZvw6c2Yxtw=; b=tQI+EAWobzwA7g6s9eVR7XUzJkULhppKOsRkBMY7pno0OVE5qbjglSmlx3gDCZJ4nk fqFJiwc48xJmjs/on9QPcZYfYlHOmHQtAjO3Rs1y5O88SEV+GMJg8BTzHMeDf1AWeNm4 9bKX432CQX8XEt5kxSt/7ZG6jHLY8J/iL0kHJtqsq/0tbjHihhhf+GdnUTmmY0auoFk2 CFEA7/p4z1GYu5hOuaDuhXST/umP0ofblwsGdCk4JLbKD5ELjeb8VHVeXRof9/aHnxjp QLg7XF57MKrA/zUkHzkVeWsQxILROmuoEQL6jevNZ5TvgU+/Yk2qRYPG40GKfrjHpqAA AKhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVy+AwT24lKbHruCnQg0+3xgrOujFsOeYvJYgNsw+h/kqGOFnIa m9pVKIINZGndC9uxq6DM2jxRnlfQCcs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwijnyKnEcwiaeCD0oLtjzz+oLNnCC2NhUhgMuXI+uYCjlywrRH1gpkeQ+dhxoRNsufQtxniQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:dd51:: with SMTP id u17mr1342400wrm.218.1559546642621; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([2.27.167.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 3sm10046338wmj.21.2019.06.03.00.24.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:24:00 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: broonie@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.xie@rock-chips.com, zhangqing@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] support a new rk80x pmic-variants (rk817 and rk809) Message-ID: <20190603072400.GD4797@dell> References: <20190508143713.27954-1-heiko@sntech.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190508143713.27954-1-heiko@sntech.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 08 May 2019, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > I've picked up and rebased Tony's patch-series for rk809 and rk817. > From the last iteration it looks like the regulator-portion did > fall through the cracks, the other patches seem to be sufficiently > reviewed/acked. > > The regulator-patch could either just be picked alone to the regulator- > tree or with an Ack go through the mfd tree with the other patches. > > > Original cover-letter + changelog follows: > > Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same, > so they can share allmost all codes. > > Their specifications are as follows: > 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same > registers > for these components except dcdc5. > 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809. > 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two. Looks like this set is still lacking a Regulator Ack. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog