From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Uninitialized variable in stmfx_irq_handler()
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:12:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190603081204.GG4797@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190515093141.GA3409@mwanda>
On Wed, 15 May 2019, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The problem is that on 64bit systems then we don't clear the higher
> bits of the "pending" variable. So when we do:
>
> ack = pending & ~BIT(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO);
> if (ack) {
>
> the if (ack) condition relies on uninitialized data. The fix it that
> I've changed "pending" from an unsigned long to a u32. I changed "n" as
> well, because that's a number in the 0-10 range and it fits easily
> inside an int. We do need to add a cast to "pending" when we use it in
> the for_each_set_bit() loop, but that doesn't cause a proble, it's
> fine.
>
> Fixes: 06252ade9156 ("mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Could do with an author's Ack here.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-03 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-15 9:31 [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Uninitialized variable in stmfx_irq_handler() Dan Carpenter
2019-06-03 8:12 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2019-06-03 9:20 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-06-06 12:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Dan Carpenter
2019-06-06 12:56 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-06-12 9:37 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190603081204.GG4797@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=amelie.delaunay@st.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox