From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8996BC04AB5 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557EE27FD8 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:04:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559567083; bh=5o50LdHm3nR94Xxp/EevvTYgj831Yo8VmYlaVsbg47w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=YIm56DT1uftfNqk3U3U+PUuwHh6kb02Ls6DNcefLYds1pPw+DUuxbtnVqfoKC1Ugh 8TKaA15Dp5iu3mlXvrZkPwOThP/JnCwcUHE5OeNfrrZRUSPhyxaxpfxwTYmBFrf8SP p7NPIsLPX+lKXjxhZFAqehQcYTayJs+jf3dZ7Ejo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728206AbfFCNEm (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:04:42 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38248 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727957AbfFCNEl (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:04:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B23327FCE; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:04:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559567081; bh=5o50LdHm3nR94Xxp/EevvTYgj831Yo8VmYlaVsbg47w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nHYsLOa1+niQjcFrjsnZT8EygUoVc8Nsv4c4oqFFgYUZ2SUlcmxk2Sy1puqQfMkK0 1Kanun8sHE3WY9gFz6g4Y5WfpgyHvipjQK2OmuCLPi7sLiKZWyr1RBrAregltfBzt8 SblmkUHUu+NKoTX1nlF8yo2OJB9LXko+1NFDY9Jo= Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:04:37 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, felix.trommer@hotmail.de, linux-kernel@i4.cs.fau.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johnfwhitmore@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/staging/rtl8192u: Reformat comments Message-ID: <20190603130437.GA30732@kroah.com> References: <20190603122104.2564-1-muellerch-privat@web.de> <20190603122104.2564-2-muellerch-privat@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190603122104.2564-2-muellerch-privat@web.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 02:21:02PM +0200, Christian Müller wrote: > From: Felix Trommer > > Replace C99-Style comments with C89-Style comments. What does that mean? > if (MaxChnlNum >= pTriple->first_channel) { > - /* It is not in a monotonically increasing order, so > + /* > + * It is not in a monotonically increasing order, so > * stop processing. > */ Those are both /* */ style comments. Where in the C99 or C89 spec does it say anything about this type of change? Are you sure you are not getting confused about // for a comment marker in C99 which is not in C89? thanks, greg k-h