From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, james.morse@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
liwei391@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: IRQ priority masking and Pseudo-NMI fixes
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 17:07:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190605160704.GP15030@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523165151.GB1716@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi again, Julien,
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:51:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 05:00:02PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > [Changing the title to make it reflex more the status of the series.]
> >
> > Version one[1] of this series attempted to fix the issue reported by
> > Zenghui[2] when using the function_graph tracer with IRQ priority
> > masking.
> >
> > Since then, I realized that priority masking and the use of Pseudo-NMIs
> > was more broken than I thought.
>
> Do you plan to respin this in light of Marc's comments?
For now, I marked this as depending on BROKEN in mainline, but please can
you look at respinning these fixes so that we can get things fixed properly
for 5.3?
Thanks,
Will
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-05 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 16:00 [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: IRQ priority masking and Pseudo-NMI fixes Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] arm64: Do not enable IRQs for ct_user_exit Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] arm64: Fix interrupt tracing in the presence of NMIs Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking Julien Thierry
2019-05-07 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-05-14 9:25 ` Julien Thierry
2019-05-14 12:01 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-14 13:08 ` Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: irqflags: Introduce explicit debugging for IRQ priorities Julien Thierry
2019-05-07 8:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-05-16 13:43 ` Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: fix kernel stack overflow in kdump capture kernel Julien Thierry
2019-05-23 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: IRQ priority masking and Pseudo-NMI fixes Will Deacon
2019-06-05 16:07 ` Will Deacon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190605160704.GP15030@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox