From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Geordan Neukum <gneukum1@gmail.com>
Cc: Hao Xu <haoxu.linuxkernel@gmail.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: kpc2000: kpc2000_i2c: void* -> void *
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 13:07:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190609110711.GA5666@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190608134505.GA963@arch-01.home>
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 01:45:05PM +0000, Geordan Neukum wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 03:27:46PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > modify void* to void * for #define inb_p(a) readq((void*)a)
> > and #define outb_p(d,a) writeq(d,(void*)a)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu.linuxkernel@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_i2c.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_i2c.c b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_i2c.c
> > index a434dd0..de3a0c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_i2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_i2c.c
> > @@ -124,9 +124,9 @@ struct i2c_device {
> >
> > // FIXME!
> > #undef inb_p
> > -#define inb_p(a) readq((void*)a)
> > +#define inb_p(a) readq((void *)a)
> > #undef outb_p
> > -#define outb_p(d,a) writeq(d,(void*)a)
> > +#define outb_p(d,a) writeq(d,(void *)a)
>
> Alternatively to fixing up the style here, did you consider just
> removing these two macros altogether and calling [read|write]q
> directly throughout the kpc_i2c driver (per the '//FIXME' comment)?
>
> Unless, I'm misunderstanding something, these macros are shadowing the
> functions [in|out]b_p, which already exist in io.h. [in|out]b_p are for
> 8-bit i/o transactions and [read|write]q are for 64-bit transactions, so
> shadowing the original [in|out]b_p with something that actually does
> 64-bit transactions is probably potentially misleading here.
Yes, these should be fixed up "properly". But I'll take the coding
style cleanups for now.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-09 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-08 7:27 [PATCH 1/2] staging: kpc2000: kpc2000_i2c: void* -> void * Hao Xu
2019-06-08 7:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: kpc2000: kpc2000_i2c: add space after , Hao Xu
2019-06-08 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: kpc2000: kpc2000_i2c: void* -> void * Geordan Neukum
2019-06-09 11:07 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190609110711.GA5666@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gneukum1@gmail.com \
--cc=haoxu.linuxkernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox