From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E024C31E40 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAE720820 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388392AbfFJRfx (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:35:53 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:44930 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388346AbfFJRfw (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:35:52 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9710F382; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:50 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Doug Ledford , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/33] docs: infiniband: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst Message-ID: <20190610113550.250aad35@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190610172712.GG18468@ziepe.ca> References: <09036fdb89c4bec94cb92d25398c026afdb134e7.1560045490.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> <20190610172712.GG18468@ziepe.ca> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:27:12 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Looks OK to me, do you want to run these patches through the docs tree > or through RDMA? > > Given that we've generally pushed doc updates through rdma, I think > I'd prefer the latter? Jonathan? Whichever works best for you is fine with me; go ahead and take them. jon